From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2055-0005c5-Lq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:02:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2054-0005yE-P1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:02:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2054-0005y1-LW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:02:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2054-00048d-J1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:02:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39570] go: update to 1.13 Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:01:37 -0500 (EST) From: Jack Hill In-Reply-To: <20200212214302.GA20114@jasmine.lan> Message-ID: References: <20200212214302.GA20114@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 39570@debbugs.gnu.org On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 02:45:27PM -0500, Jack Hill wrote: >> I believe that in Go 1.13, the upstream issued that lead to excessive >> references being maintained in go programs [2] has been fixed, but I did not >> undo our workaround. > > I wonder, should it be a goal to undo it? It's not idiomatic for Guix, > but it is for Go. I had stopped thinking of it as a workaround. Perhaps not. I don't see a strong need to revert, but wanted to point out that the original reason for doing that had changed. Best, Jack