From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id kG+NBAx+LmXaNAAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:29:00 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id kG+NBAx+LmXaNAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:29:00 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FDEE53E4B for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:28:59 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1697545740; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=tC3FSO/9EQt4A/ZO/NiRQ9YHoxmYlNn+WXnXGsOBbdc=; b=fjnhEKkJYY7o1Het5yF5qHDjENQ5j5sKYX7okjVu2w/q6l42aQ+aUzOTaaHH6LadQ2ljAE x8JXpcAf1Vo/OcLefn/YP65tXH3S6ByllpTJbs596ZZbbKRsCr0RoGBLLovGtGCRrHuOdN z1jsKxH7wSJeSx3H19VBshuR36AzwnkLipjwGbskl1gOwgk181iT8zWUFUYzQMgRCGwEDp jnWRYRo+AjqONIedQMNXtF7s2YzqzXzO8oIDNcxdkLQo09OhUz/+0FJx8a1ZsfGifCbcVP SW8lR4QTdNUw/+DXr3L9i/KOcvC/NAxyOVQW/8rIhwHeMLlKJ+0R2xSUIhw9ww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1697545740; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PmGbcawREdpYwCwAifRlwZL489bygx7BNVbfpQu+EWSLoLA/JXVwtwBj3axGGw11Y/kJdN ci/6aojA6JcjV+T6RbyyYCjsIOhsF6EV9qossuP70Sci0JdutxcOZzxty+Bv7RP6Dm+Acm K8jyRPoM/s+B+GE9jtgm5hIvixb/OmAip3TzukYrVM+V4HXHZ4vcHJIM57tFyRF0yIO+fg YkU3lT6FmRyyog0CMhNE78gak7Nb/pROjyPMCRbd0nb+n5yPwJEzE9CEbMOtVDEdZCFi1M w9OP9fsT5v4A0uQQMrJhFfgtBa4rdIFTuCigqSgRmVQgwMBsK8snM2zr/ew1/A== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBi-0004Ay-00; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBf-00047m-HA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:40 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBd-0004xK-5T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjC2-00044K-2I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#66448] [PATCH] image: Add 'lba partition label. Resent-From: Gabriel Wicki Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66448 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 66448@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66448-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66448.169754570515581 (code B ref 66448); Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 66448) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2023 12:28:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBR-00043F-8e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:25 -0400 Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]:46713) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBN-00042x-6n for 66448@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCA940146; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TxwLtgI0Hfti; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:46 +0200 From: Gabriel Wicki Message-ID: References: <87o7h58ruw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6mud6am.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h6mud6am.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.64 X-Spam-Score: -5.64 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8FDEE53E4B X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-TUID: fZ18tsE7J4Jh Hello Mathieu Thanks for looking into it. And yes, that was exactly what happened. Plus i was tricked by my own setup (for once showing the LBA label and another time not). Oh well (: I've attached a possible patch for the documentation. Thanks again for the review and the clarification of the issue. Best regards >From eacb1696cdc51350e3d5d223b94a2546c459d2ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-ID: From: Gabriel Wicki Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:16:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Clarify partition LBA compatibility. * doc/guix.texi (partition Reference): Clarify LBA compatibility. --- doc/guix.texi | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 3517c95251..6b6d166290 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -45649,7 +45649,8 @@ partition Reference @item @code{file-system} (default: @code{"ext4"}) The partition file system as a string, defaulting to @code{"ext4"}. The supported values are @code{"vfat"}, @code{"fat16"}, @code{"fat32"} and -@code{"ext4"}. +@code{"ext4"}. @code{"vfat"}, @code{"fat16"} and @code{"fat32"} +partitions without the @code{'esp} flag are by default LBA compatible. @item @code{file-system-options} (default: @code{'()}) The partition file system creation options that should be passed to the base-commit: d389f6777359aa44ef9c71989fc1f49e6b222f1d -- 2.41.0