From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kAdFBeVb6V7BBgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:55:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 4GIbAeVb6V4iVwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:55:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F05A94053D for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlLQA-0001TX-Ex for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:55:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlLPy-0001Sw-Nf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:55:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlLPy-0004kP-EQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:55:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlLPy-0006Vn-Cy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:55:02 -0400 Subject: bug#41869: [PATCH] gnu: libmateweather: Add patch to rename a timezone city. Resent-From: Jonathan Brielmaier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 41869 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 41869-close@debbugs.gnu.org, 41869@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 41869@debbugs.gnu.org, jonathan.brielmaier@web.de, jonathan.brielmaier@web.de Received: via spool by 41869-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D41869.159235167424966 (code D ref 41869); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 41869-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 23:54:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49908 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlLPW-0006Ub-AW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:54:34 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:53035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlLPV-0006UL-8c; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:54:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1592351636; bh=cpo1lpWvffoX1lQxcqbtBuPVUf1xE3/KuTVJkmXpl5k=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DyJ5xl1DxWm7MMTfcttWJp9ADet4tbG3YlcwllHh+1u/GnroTBPmWgoYPmNxN7REQ Bksk21tW0Qgjc+C1ATAwlYJg3cBSKPeKhpjnvzFwxHBbLMSAeidWWaOKORi87PiUQX 56XcotVsbHHeE2popufmIcasYn8UwLPfLqZJH+18= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([88.152.184.127]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLxrY-1joceW1SBA-007iw5; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 01:53:56 +0200 From: Jonathan Brielmaier References: <20200615101001.30670-1-jonathan.brielmaier@web.de> <20200615102935.GE1990@E5400> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 01:53:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ovLdQF3c9sH+9As64O1oPjzNv2u7Zp1IzkOwTV95lvAiLzfVCKb NnGGEnYadMa8bPpUjR3LRiUcKIRxkmnGr8p5O6zcnOKIAhJb5qEjSv30LkcEwp+9BTAUSDp y29DALW5w7ljmi+ZNaykSdZSgDqSZRXW/+SQPLKYVoUluRwvWX9Ungixvb9N3+WxSUauuE/ S/EhWzCf2dxxEeCQNsHYA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:CJCTNRF7V5s=:4NODy3nH8fCjzexTPm3rn4 NwchEp9T45Mkr9gs/71AlEyF3rJABRmL8WWTtWDawslDP7PGmpaBcrjTqKHYLbcUBI5RXReeR cBFavruOa7iLMVzGeNDUGK2z1O+4Am8sGxA8zghOeNGhZTlws1rhxhYYzFhG0tFIRXwMcW/KC vj4MwZ7MOy5/D7z3mGLBqOlCmNy0P2a5En5++f5MtjEZ6mHGiaLjqG05tlxirTRAvCKiaR4y9 ljtjObEIPbGDh15MO47BNXDe87NnBpjigWU2lcFucocNmjc8ww61lS+/T7fbSLfHKJZD/bgA+ fdtxVB+1696rbJW/iGKd49YWWuAX2USa5B3jGI9gY65xEF0jDfuJKl3extN1uUsCkujl0E1S0 rynmmew5N5l6BuCb2LXNnE5reizNChVvmnC3LaG/lrXAGVL16GY/4weBNBF31K0MYUPFql0MX /3ghbf3Ps26lFZ9nN0A+qEoC5TsFDmOjtbBec3/LmZdYhXN9YeRl9CZoqNwPBasU+OK1Nxrll BQ7JntTECUIZE2jYSjC8wp/UskQHg4J0XouLNHIYQN2Adg45fL7U12Pc9QtZ0PofpfrQgGeZC EzNUxSz2wpof8TxXs0Kx7oLh8K9pAnqzEX6dsnI51nL9IhPviUVdHU7LsstnGD/uxiwHfCDIf ZNEctjmsfp1ywcR/Ptyih9uBDsY8frZ31w0PLOWaoY5BgE05AXLDnPC5RQxShTki08D1QyA3t NkYnUfxVQueRVNCbW/N7sMVjsBOwe4+Dx07CocRWtG2E7qy+hPuKVR5UUNrlWovTUrJbBKXtM nrMstpvr0nIB8dvg8qVPjrvo5AwW9aGvrTDhfMIxTpPy0J3mdtGqY+LP01BX2iZ0zzCoa+9UT xoCtZ98iZGtKHee8iOvKYh/Xx3HO4DvcJrAFiqh169DMZG0Q57xu/+0pdgggWjsLGKCVFo+g1 R5enFGz/HKtUrRTgaoZSR8c2n+K3YUb/GV07+COD/z9n348Zkjx2SAtJ6SIipkDgAdcLjPNCY 7oUihxaTOrj9rtdtZXBbJ3d4RhzVkdco3KCv4o7OXwX/H52/qsEZlAwJAYbitJz68w8uSve/b jcikNfBWnMzsNASKHKWNqNrJwmI1O7GaA/vJ+A2mdfnYj68sLfxYJjvd4Jg5aUqWJjkGMc3XN Zi3HpWVtAHxoYA1rSmLYMrNq7ase/L7PryLKm0HdjtO8Ztoy2EJBSI9OIjIYLeFra7742N9w+ qzD5vj57kPeSvFmbq X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=web.de header.s=dbaedf251592 header.b=DyJ5xl1D; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: Ma/SrkXCgWcp Closing. Mathieu did it in e23ec7144c264902ac13fa75e01a206e4d907e5a On 15.06.20 12:38, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote: > Could be, but I'm more a fan of patches because it will fail after the > next update of the package. Snippets are easier to forget for clean up..= . > > On 15.06.20 12:29, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> This looks like it could just be a snippet in the origin