From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id YOJwMwvs9GIHagEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:46:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id MK9lMwvs9GLBMgEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:46:19 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5612FFBE for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oM6dl-0001Tu-71 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 07:46:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oM6ca-0001Oi-2y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 07:45:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oM6cX-0003Kj-Ty for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 07:45:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oM6cX-0001CX-KF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 07:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#57050] [PATCH v2 05/13] gnu: racket: Update to 8.6. Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57050 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Philip McGrath , 57050@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler , Thiago Jung Bauermann Received: via spool by 57050-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57050.16602182964575 (code B ref 57050); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:45:01 +0000 Received: (at 57050) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2022 11:44:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51944 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oM6cR-0001Bi-LH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 07:44:56 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:6703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oM6cM-0001BV-UJ for 57050@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 07:44:54 -0400 Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4M3Q2j5fGCz1LZXw; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:44:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4M3Q2j5fGCz1LZXw DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1660218286; bh=qQB3fVv+SwLLX9eykXExN7GM9oC5zIeYlo0lhgqE6UA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RVfXW7qGCgxe8IFjKu3IMVtbmxyqMYq7Unxw/8MCH9vO/K0c4fknf6jGM2K9R7V4d Zi8xz0JwG7bZAfMxbceelD+/T5UxX+pqwWFhEbiL5a3Rsv2qR7y/oQtjPoqmtVMdpP JBk46dWhzGFCsQlKpR/GnqReLL8gj9ub6keiQCco= Message-ID: From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:44:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5e784e0d35bf5b342bd7df77c4fa137deb942e47.1660215295.git.philip@philipmcgrath.com> References: <5e784e0d35bf5b342bd7df77c4fa137deb942e47.1660215295.git.philip@philipmcgrath.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1660218378; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=qQB3fVv+SwLLX9eykXExN7GM9oC5zIeYlo0lhgqE6UA=; b=EI3z47fAlRGn0m6ejIt82+/ef0boEzRLLvc4sNrljVCfSK03CWruLJ7nkcPYY9MrNh27NE kBXZPauvNhon8i8q7NcNWjJNL6OnDGWbzFZwXZc6WUFDmP6jHcylEJaukQGwtqeMJvNJRP x5Dt3LQkpc+9KaEQngUG2cf2+hu6090ioLFReKHLUaMvdz67rt5VNHpFOzIuIW9/Gq4ug3 ADwO2QoZWTxKb58bxVWQGrZnWO3+KRMaMGY4SJNgp7XyEQOu5vEt46Ssk6fz4Q7hbSZnor pw7BAvva1V96K7QkQZClqICamx9P0OFo4flraX/Rc1D2HoL1NECQKdKpbYWuEg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1660218378; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ca5AsQuSFUn2xMv1CLQ3yHOwXz0xc5tOc2MOf2jk99SsPyUUgCUAijf6o6kQDeSlJBTv9U kLrkXO/sy482ZeS0cuu8nCp1Wv3x18otJRDb++3U3SLUM+QXlK5S0UUM8Bjg1bHvCy6snG QCR5MFWJKeU5+bLHe7O6MXmAEwuLpom6Nbmyh5NgC77c07PqhS6ZH0GZ6qS0U875iVC1OL 2ZqyXapeOwTeDn0t1oRFoJM/sevmyDHu4NTwERi7hapwC5y31lWxlpx8u/T2rK10V/UQdP Jwj18BWASiW/YuFN3GRhP/eLAOA/IvJSuzKyPLTPzDV8LeoUGQqd/i4XtKQImA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=RVfXW7qG; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 8.12 X-Spam: Yes Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=RVfXW7qG; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7A5612FFBE X-Spam-Score: 8.12 X-Migadu-Spam: Yes X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: dJf3Zc+U2eAO Am Donnerstag, dem 11.08.2022 um 07:08 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath: > Also, update 'chez-scheme-for-racket' to 9.5.9.2. As with Zuo, can this be split into a separate patch? If not, why does it get mentioned here as something noteworthy rather than just being part of the ChangeLog? > [...] > @@ -448,18 +456,52 @@ (define-public chez-scheme-for-racket >         (delete "libx11" "util-linux:lib"))) >      (native-inputs >       (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs chez-scheme) > +       (append zuo) >         (replace "chez-scheme-bootstrap-bootfiles" >           chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles))) Prefer prepend over append. >      (arguments >       (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments chez-scheme) > +       ((#:out-of-source? _ #f) > +        #t) > +       ((#:tests? _ #t) > +        ;; FIXME: There have been some flaky test failures. Some have > been > +        ;; fixed upstream post-release but have proven non-trivial to > +        ;; backport; at least one issue remains. Re-enable tests once > +        ;; https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/4359 is fixed. > +        #f) Rather than skipping tests altogether, skip just the flaky ones. > @@ -130,12 +132,12 @@ (define-module (gnu packages racket) >  ;; output. The function 'racket-vm-for-system' returns the > recomended Racket >  ;; VM package for a given system. >  ;; > -;; The file 'racket.scm' builds on these packages to define 'racket- > minimal' > -;; and 'racket' packages. These use Racket's support for ``layered > -;; installations'', which allow an immutable base layer to be > extended with > -;; additional packages. They use the layer configuration directly > provide > -;; ready-to-install FHS-like trees, rather than relying on the built > in > -;; ``Unix-style install'' mechanism. > +;; We then define the packages 'racket-minimal' and > +;; 'racket'. These use Racket's support for ``layered > installations'', which > +;; allow an immutable base layer to be extended with additional > packages. > +;; They use the layer configuration directly provide ready-to- > install FHS-like > +;; trees, rather than relying on the built in ``Unix-style install'' > +;; mechanism. >  ;; >  ;; Bootstrapping Racket: >  ;; --------------------- This is a leftover from 8.6, but do the "FHS-like" installations actually adhere to the FHS or just to the bit that says "opt means we can do whatever we want 😎️"? > @@ -178,16 +180,18 @@ (define-module (gnu packages racket) >  ;; However, other Racket subsystems implemented in Racket for Racket > CS >  ;; use older C implementations for Racket BC, whereas the reader, > expander, >  ;; and module system were completely replaced with the Racket > implementation > -;; as of Racket 7.0. > +;; as of Racket 7.0. See also > . >  ;; >  ;; For Racket BC, the compiled "linklet" s-expressions (primitive > modules) >  ;; are embeded in C as a static string constant. Eventually, they > are further >  ;; compiled by the C-implemented Racket BC bytecode and JIT > compilers. > -;; (On platforms where Racket BC's JIT is not supported, yet another > compiler > -;; instead compiles the linklets to C code, but this is not a > bootstrapping > -;; issue.) >  ;; > -;; Code: > +;; Zuo is notably *not* a problem for bootstrapping. The > implementation is a > +;; single hand-written C file designed to build with just `cc -o zuo > zuo.c`, > +;; even with very old or limited compilers. (We use the Autoconf > support for > +;; convienience.) > +;; > +;; CODE: Is that something that needs be mentioned? As always, Racket contains a gazillion of updated hashes that I will simply trust you on until a build fails. Cheers