Hi Leo!

> Sorry for the delayed response.
> 
>> Unifont provides TrueType, PCF, and PSF. It does not have OTF fonts.
> 
> That's correct. I was suggesting a scenario of using more than one type. :-)
> 
>> Currently, if a user installs 'font-gnu-unifont' they get TrueType
>> fonts.
>>
>> On the other hand, the PSF fonts can be used in the bootloader and the
>> Linux console, and they are only 68 kilobytes, rather than ~22 megabytes
>> if you combine all the font outputs. I don't see a compelling reason for
>> that increase.
> 
> OK. I think of two reasons: 1) If one installs this package with
> suggested patch, the user can use unifont for any purpose as they wish.
> It may be application (ttf), console/grub (psf) and/or display server
> (pcf). 2) The setup will be consistent with other font packages, where
> the package installs fonts with all the types it can provide.
> 
>> If the problem is that packages with multiple outputs are confusing, we
>> should try to improve the UI, and we shouldn't use multiple outputs if
>> there isn't a good reason. But this is a case where I think it makes
>> sense.
> 
> Improving UI would be good too. Regarding multiple outputs, I think it
> is good enough to separate libs, bins and docs. In this packages, we
> already separated bin and fonts. I suggest that we shall not separate
> fonts further into it's subtypes. That is all I ask. :-)

I have attached revised patch with this email. :-)

Regards,
RG.