From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AD7oJNjSF2DmHAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:07:20 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WMqFINjSF2AYMwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:07:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86CB1940276 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39740 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W74-0007Kp-9M for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:07:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W6o-0007Jy-5p for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:07:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W6n-0004tb-Ui for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:07:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W6n-0004Wm-OB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:07:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm Resent-From: Ellis =?UTF-8?Q?Keny=C5=91?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46215 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Prikler Received: via spool by 46215-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46215.161217397517348 (code B ref 46215); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:07:01 +0000 Received: (at 46215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 10:06:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W62-0004Vj-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:06:15 -0500 Received: from mail.elken.dev ([165.22.120.78]:51461) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W5z-0004VO-9S for 46215@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:06:12 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (mail.elken.dev [165.22.120.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.elken.dev (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0F443F3B4; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:06:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elken.dev; s=mail; t=1612173964; bh=M/eKYOYDIeGYYLmXv3oS9FyTio3LK34vAVqs78jw57k=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:CC:From; b=yxlbtt3sixV7qaDKGYkok4l40GnodcG8my4baFRfAOGCrmRG6p8wAlQc4pXkF9A0C 4fLdHc7sYYnqF07SuPCCJ81VM/bbFP7vfVc+HUosx0iZNyA9b5D/kN1jeNyRsC41XP 4z+7bTejXC4Bitrzkwj/y2JtoBKfcKT9IXU4UnXNVmtONoeiNR+N0hSB/J/0tA7YIu +PYRjcR+Xzk2T4YTXgeMmztQcYcEVZZRF8NGkScQE5jxdYCU2SrbzTbWcM6gX/hKq0 J/fbAe9c8Ocma0wPoyIihHbNP4lQ2sGFQAW3FvcKq0rNHjjMlfqYB/A6/ZMElosSr8 clOn2QGba7bKA== In-Reply-To: <38ed969df583e9254802fa7a4a80299ec5caddc4.camel@student.tugraz.at> References: <20210131164721.8792-1-me@elken.dev> <84ab5054792abeb5e9b85d21229cd7182204d817.camel@student.tugraz.at> <87czxkc0yv.fsf@elken.dev> <0ff6a0c2cc9a2f65cd51c1eeb9e6a33aa4789766.camel@student.tugraz.at> <669deac8-ffa5-42ba-8741-3cae0b18220e@elken.dev> <38ed969df583e9254802fa7a4a80299ec5caddc4.camel@student.tugraz.at> X-Referenced-Uid: 2581 Thread-Topic: Re: [PATCH] Add yadm X-Is-Generated-Message-Id: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----ROPBZIAUN11FPVRS4JS4BP9773KDDS" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:06:03 +0000 Message-ID: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46215@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Ellis =?UTF-8?Q?Keny=C5=91?= X-ACL-Warn: , Ellis =?UTF-8?Q?Keny=C5=91?= via Guix-patches From: guix-patches--- via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elken.dev header.s=mail header.b=yxlbtt3s; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 86CB1940276 X-Spam-Score: -2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: rn9mAHipEKBx ------ROPBZIAUN11FPVRS4JS4BP9773KDDS Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I understand that, the question was how are they handled if they're install= ed after yadm? Would yadm be rebuilt with the new inputs? On 1 Feb 2021, = 08:14, at 08:14, Leo Prikler wrote: >= Am Montag, den 01=2E02=2E2021, 03:44 +0000 schrieb Ellis Keny=C5=91: >> Hi = Leo, >> >> I understand what to do, I just wasn't sure how dependencies >>= installed later would be handled=2E Some are optional and if they don't >>= exist yadm just carries on, but some are required=2E >> >> Would the opti= onal ones still be handled? >Guix' policy is to include as many optional de= pendencies as possible, >up to a reasonable limit in closure size=2E In th= is case, that's >hopefully all of them=2E > >Regards, >Leo ------ROPBZIAUN11FPVRS4JS4BP9773KDDS Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I understand= that, the question was how are they handled if they're installed after yad= m? Would yadm be rebuilt with the new inputs?
On 1 Feb 2021, at 08:14, Leo Prikler <leo=2Eprikler@student=2Etugraz= =2Eat> wrote:
Am Montag, den 01=2E02=2E2021, 03:44 +0000 schrie=
b Ellis Keny=C5=91:
 Hi=
 Leo,
 
 I understand what to do, I just wasn't sure how dependencies=

 installed later would be handled=2E Some are optional and if they don'=
t
 exist yadm just carries on, but some are required=2E
 
 Would t=
he optional ones still be handled?
Guix' policy is to inclu=
de as many optional dependencies as possible,
up to a reasonable limit i=
n closure size=2E  In this case, that's
hopefully all of them=2E

=
Regards,
Leo
------ROPBZIAUN11FPVRS4JS4BP9773KDDS--