From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id +GloIVQ4qWWSMAEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:40:20 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id +GloIVQ4qWWSMAEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:40:20 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705588820; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=NJLsy5J99f6lvrQueNNjubtQ1Rm1iC8L4m3miwYND+g=; b=GVIfbjevYOsdrgTuQ3LRD/oNgEbjju5ZeyzZWYVTMoeLP0ZsK7NAppkO5VIulwMKvl1t7q uv8J7IeH1koX8qFDa03JUeDlN98m5BNuNms4lJMoMVIx7WAY2xeUb298+zNfso8fRUvxZb RSvvvuQEJjXYFqGUPZ1rH3GW6zWhLuUMs/QrqA12Sme39pxyRffM8Fnlzl+4VZ/NohO3Z8 bTuASaRiHxevR2/Ve4ns/Pe9mX0SQ9Y9ofT2uT1bw0D6JJbeqGE764dNawzZN/O7D6Kshs QVmBWz0pVpJkpaqmjqb66Qe6tFJgNm/WuMcfV/0htE3jP+198sm0DGECkxR8dA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705588820; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=iLzGIlutdGvi3ZIQ5xXAtXbokcDiy8rqMKJksJbPnHAnlUHHnvSpM6vq0jYPZABo9WbZTf jmwpLj9uIkwUikami/1/mGVeVMIdY028R8umt2j5eIhe0KP8bDbUAz+PWP2HejA8rkvdAi V2V6HZbBB7+8KF7mGH8ajWiU7JHsMoxDhBnGxRw+lOGXCAKCcr1SPOM27cd99R7ztdvCFj UAg+/CH1p4HIJbmCwnqLDVXCeEY+TZc+4cr2VIgPEjSphYLUcsBP9HwNO+WFwdSnmQcM2X jGgxTqcgJoQacSbVn0IF+BFg+fmbBETkMYdjMulhdCKc3JKTBDGgrpXwnNct+A== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547BB205A6 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:40:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQTYq-000273-5M; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:40:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQTYn-00025z-JZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:40:01 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQTYn-0005ue-9k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:40:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQTYo-0007Do-9L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#64259] [PATCH 2/2] Provide md-array-device-mapping to start MD arrays via UUID or name. Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64259 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Felix Lechner Cc: 64259@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 64259-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64259.170558879327731 (code B ref 64259); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 64259) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2024 14:39:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54615 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQTYd-0007DC-Ig for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:39:53 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43254) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQTYZ-0007Cs-Bo for 64259@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:39:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0F3E2A; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:39:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R6PSCnMBOpVZ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:39:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [147.210.16.130]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 248B9D24; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:39:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:39:36 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <4e7eab10caeacfb1f8a0736cdab7154c517b9e36.1687571974.git.felix.lechner@lease-up.com> <87bkctt0vh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs22pn6a.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87fs22pn6a.fsf@lease-up.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.93 X-Spam-Score: -5.93 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 547BB205A6 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: Gx7KnDAOK+uj Hello, Am Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:44:13AM -0700 schrieb Felix Lechner: > > Does the busy wait loop currently in ‘open-raid-device’ need to be > > preserved? > I personally do not believe so but I'll defer to Andreas Enge, whom I > copied on this message. I believe Andreas wrote the original device > mapping. well, I do not know whether it is still needed. It appears that when I wrote the code for bayfront, we needed to wait a bit until the hard disks appeared. Are there reasons to believe that this has changed in the meantime? Andreas