From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id WN4SAmk78mKRSwEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:48:09 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id ePU2AWk78mJ+mwAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:48:09 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D423D08E for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:48:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLMmN-00084Q-K0 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:48:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLMmI-000842-M3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:48:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLMmH-0004vk-Q2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLMmH-00073p-Jc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#56729] [RFC PATCH 00/10] Add sagemath. Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 10:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56729 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 56729@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant Received: via spool by 56729-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56729.166004206127012 (code B ref 56729); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 10:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 56729) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 10:47:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLMlw-00071a-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:47:41 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:50798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLMls-00070s-FO for 56729@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:47:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B602F8; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:47:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id La_BjOFuCaAL; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:47:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0:1ce9:67cd:7487:edd5]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14C4E1F9; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:47:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:47:27 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <87y1w81flc.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1660042088; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=xAVKg9gBumrf4VYZrew0eqn1/r9iYj7bcuqGIlwQE7w=; b=NM4zgABtGTV1wa1cKdAHX+7DuL/C5GQwItIfvrIsKu8zvV7B4zLh603yYFsW9aPlspfI3Z U5Stz2TH62cQ1TTKlIvm/lX1/yBAewkqDnp+20o1MKx95A6wTJ0IjOjjI+VH1ZWkZ7jFq1 Fdb9ME5WDMYpCIujnO7p6qahHFyROAT7QLZuh/0cTvW3Xa/c+laMtsSurrhAvRpSZi63TT yMUKAFueke5rvXXrCiRAzaWOsC+k1lBEUVeLCVLUtwmS9RC6ECn1vFOCaXC8Syq9yeTF0x JAd66J6529ReNpE/4YKdvFpu44aayAAOb/ssOUawjOx57lPZSZHE3vr+KFJ/0A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1660042088; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CGo+h7sBlp0Vo+cE3mfR7IrES0+WUnTD/9a50nvpczrGNvdhjU3UMd2Xa2lcLcpt7DEQIr 0MRV0kjOVqNPU3iH1rKFmvsjlwNczN1b6sSMsRWzGJkC9e/0yDlIXpztRnBrTg9D4raASY 8nXfnMzU9H5Jz13iBhy/mDxNOZPfX8XTfpeL0Zv7opncLlVa3YIvsUVk3xJdkmk91eu9y9 RhO+gSoNNPA3GjKDfmbDY4ioi4eS5+yiXHwQ7J69Ud+kHKZbRmZvylyt9aTSAUOV+vqG35 LKoxiwh79s6qXHPO5Uu7LajuubEiqEhb2UY2G0WcEjusymVeXxUxD5wNSIyqDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.99 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C5D423D08E X-Spam-Score: -3.99 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 7xW8zjlVdlZx Hello, Am Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 06:20:22PM +0200 schrieb guix@ikherbers.com: > Great! But note that I just sent an updated series with minor touch ups :). thanks for the update! I just pushed an update of maxima (and wxmaxima), but without your addition of ecl. Is there a good reason for this? In any case, this should be done in a separate commit, since it is not required for the update. For the record, I also tried to compile with gcl, but this still failed. > > Concerning sagemath itself, below is my very old version of an attempt at > > packaging the library. Some things look reassuringly similar, my handling > > of the number of cores is less nice, but I do delete the bundled packages. > The `upstream' directory only seems to exist in the published tarball. > So this should be no problem if we build from git. Ah, interesting. Which one should we do? I personally tend to prefer tarballs (as the official distribution mechanism of the project). Recently there has been a preference in the Guix project for git repositories when autotools are involved, as they make it possible to recreate the configure scripts from their source. But since this is not the case here, the argument does not hold. Andreas