From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id wBjGFQlvYGENFwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 18:17:13 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id EA+eEAlvYGH2KgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:17:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CCBE2E88F for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50920 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsYZ-0007ga-DB for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:17:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsYQ-0007g8-OC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:17:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsYQ-0006ru-Gb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:17:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsYQ-0002GG-AD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#50960] [PATCH 00/10] Add 'guix shell' to subsume 'guix environment' Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50960 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 50960@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50960-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50960.16337097708622 (code B ref 50960); Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 50960) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2021 16:16:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsXa-0002F0-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:16:10 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:44905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsXY-0002EZ-Em for 50960@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:16:08 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1EE5C010B; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:16:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=zmpDsrVlrPlLVnoHFCMgU6CnSg9WB5GHvuAiFNtRsiY=; b=FMNW9+JjRP0Z kD0/4inY7KlcvzSf2xold8viDjN51fqil3w+nuVs2PGoUbOpseQXJUe8+iRWKxJ0 JJD8xVU5308BlusuBaHqktPiV9CVpbyfun1VI++59KDK2ovpH+8plWOkDukD7S5b XpWzwUZzqggt8x5HQwS9a0M3OuPiH6s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=zmpDsrVlrPlLVnoHFCMgU6CnSg9WB5GHvuAiFNtRs iY=; b=JtLHhf2hFwwKXCfoERl/INYFV2tWLCLBvb2bjt3682yR570EFE9tYmvwn 5UjL5SDqrCYFTK5HXB6gtvGSLQn58FJcONTHLYRnwd8xsb2BCvdSs2Y2mgFWMnQ5 DW14GsYzsneL0LIKqyT6mluHCjEJzbQ9RwAC+44kuF6zZhjWwL9anOunkBFH0rV8 LRC5DOm+o1+poyiu0Q+t2N5iM2a7aQBEXVyUxST9rvxk65dNUFldN6iZZUg7L+2R 4ysxMYDKqLaPVb/Qhrv3LY/4LJTdm8c2V1rXaMor7yAtZQWQ0PJp2ujqMeqOIjs9 XdUCgbZoEnOELRmWsVUZbMJp7JUPw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddttddgleeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeejgeeghedtudfgffdutddvffefffejkeffffevffehgedvvdeutdffkeej jeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:00 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <20211002102116.27726-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87o88055d4.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87o88055d4.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1633709833; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=zmpDsrVlrPlLVnoHFCMgU6CnSg9WB5GHvuAiFNtRsiY=; b=Px7hSq1cqgeNjZQS0LXHdSNWpHPNRzs5b6Yl3RPohHuUdMraRqaQo3ndqJ27SBIICt2AsA CO9Az1uLD4IL13pL7lwreTY1F1Xo74qyt4cvN/McJFtkmtm9PfandVuwp35LNLJX9Ke83u ceZc2oWJA8OtM27sLl0PhfWXS3pytS0IrAh6QXkrcSbd4fV4HmunahaciOBFSaXBfYruBS btuoYAuwOmRr894xBWzn4O6jYhmtvkbnzeINDicMSa9o3CWsmqeT2ZB4Rk0FmQa5eEoI+m TXUXKXKsdnZi4F+Hjfn6Q5Hpr7tKc47imNgZZJ/3v0RTpQ9V2mGFhW7Fzk1l9A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1633709833; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GzqMrFkMWgXpI+REr5OP9Kc8BG86hQ3K2hUW0yF0q68XuKrJHr+m0w2SJJ5e9q92mSTKe1 Bq4ktPAEQ/59mqVsHu/tc+ifE5+ugD/IzXQH7XJnaZiHieuVt4+UcAwb9rkUY1//U+QC4w z2hKLHGiQ307CZC4H2AXxtw8DfKawqleVQXbOk+M46y+vSnL1KC9p5UBOH9hVmAMSapuIR 7wBKOBk0P0bV2s6Vl1ZFqHdKxE4jvB588XzFc/GlWauqTkVPWKKENx70sY6mcbIVXeSpH3 a9PddU5dEcFGXzkkC7lyKSsf0xFuu86rN94oikCJDH86aJiRYINwbvRp552Vzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=FMNW9+Jj; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=JtLHhf2h; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.09 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=FMNW9+Jj; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=JtLHhf2h; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5CCBE2E88F X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 1jpmLClB1wnk On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:43:19AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > No, it’s the same. However, ‘-D’ here affects only the immediately > following package, whereas ‘--ad-hoc’ would affect every package that > follows. I must not know the correct terminology; that's what I was trying to ask. Can we keep the old behavior? Or do we think this new way of doing it is better?