From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +GbSBS27218fCQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:10:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id OLmjAS27218hKwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:10:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A12940142 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpzbN-0002Vh-Tp for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:10:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpzb8-0002Us-CZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:10:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpzb8-0003hY-5W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:10:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kpzb7-0004cQ-Uq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:10:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45276] [PATCH 00/26] Update sequoia-opengpg to 1.0.0 Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45276 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Hartmut Goebel Received: via spool by 45276-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45276.160823575117652 (code B ref 45276); Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:10:01 +0000 Received: (at 45276) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2020 20:09:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kpzaI-0004ac-Ru for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:09:11 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:37524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kpzaF-0004aA-I1 for 45276@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:09:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [5.102.238.249]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 482E6402CF; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:08:58 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: References: <87tuskmq7l.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="27oKeqIrWggYYtdz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45276@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.91 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A1A12940142 X-Spam-Score: -3.91 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: uW9lj5sgs0tI --27oKeqIrWggYYtdz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:05:58PM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > >=20 > > I think the big warning in rust-dbl-0.3's description could be removed. >=20 > Fine for me. will do. >=20 >=20 > > Also, I notice you often skip builds, even though this is not required. > > E.g., I could build rust-pin-utils-0.1 without any problem just removing > > the #:skip-build keyword. I think the trend is use #:skip-build only > > when absolutely necessary. >=20 > Building crate "libraries" is of no use. Rust still has no notion of > "libraries", neither shared not static. it does not even provide any means > to use "object"-files from another package. All crates will be build again > and again for each package using it. And you will notice that the output = of > most crates will be almost empty (only exception: if the crate build a > program). >=20 > This is why the crates importer sets skip-build for all packages it impor= ts > as dependencies. (It also does not add the crate-build-dependencies for > these packages.) I'm in favor of building the packages anyway, it serves as a check that the inputs are actually correct. > > Finally, I wonder if replacements, e.g., rust-capnp-futures-0.10 by > > rust-capnp-futures-0.13, require to remove the old variable. It could be > > used out of the code base. >=20 > We are lacking a common practice on this yet. IMO it does not make much > sense to provide packages for old crates. crates are using semantic > versioning, so in the long run we might end up maintaining hundreds of old > packages. >=20 > Concrete for this bunch of packages: These have been added by myself when > packaging sequoia last April. So maybe thos turns the balance :-) >=20 As long as you're sure there's nothing else in tree that's depending on it, I suppose it's ok to remove them. I view it similarly when I clean up package names to drop not significant digits from the versioning in the name, ie rust-slog-2.5 -> rust-slog-2. If the rust ecosystem slows down some I'd be happy to keep more versions but it's already one of the largest package modules we have. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --27oKeqIrWggYYtdz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIyBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl/butoACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1ES7Q/4xDYgL8JZVLvr6CdnqYUiHOrThJKfukjN9h7q4Wo7ryeXL4UCaE324pOI vdmPNRXBV8w1Iqql4j+4FotofxgpC2RnwhrX2+Z5ZMpVDICrPwCrL9XPMFYdzxkb 6jIU/4Kv3BLVycfhDXf96hydqB5I1s4sqKNiD4Uz3E/WNT7fWDtcDODaG5NGNTLg eaN4S9acj2aBB6koZrg2yZSB96wqRYaNTEmIXGx2HE5TDSquaFMboI9HQH8XZaAt /XEsd4QNCXznBE30wmn+kTTtx5tC+PIKQEECa4IA9s6SZ9l4lWmHhVg35ilYeq3M qllg9OEUCz6+5vafzItL3mag7Sz8VasLEhj7hob3gDAGa+8QDdQHjf6GbfaDmbyo lyepVFng6IOqN7kmnsjURPQRBBj0DwhCSC4H85BUDMNrSjtl3viwm1zT8cQB1P+u IdpRue/WdtJhtw3xv3uMUR/eE5eKSPxJweBFrlMuS4laAfeXcTb6A9hgXZqZgQNN w6dy1ICoSD8rX46HeS6QdqENnMShhnyh3qe8bD5nacY8To1uGHd+dtI3ce451hiU nGHKhA3VEssZq16OUSl7y12yaPlhMgzSpxMo4wEvm3zcyrXG5hUWnNpc9NLwfNBV Ll99KSdkyCOFWrdIEx/EiGN9pt+hXRMWbemSumlcaLiEq+gVWQ== =kP77 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --27oKeqIrWggYYtdz--