From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8PuDK7mm0F85KwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:28:09 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id +FBdJ7mm0F/TJAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:28:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A67D940111 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34478 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwhc-0008JH-4o for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:28:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwhV-0008Ix-UK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:28:01 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwhV-0003ba-NX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:28:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwhV-0004Xm-KM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45020] [PATCH 0/2] image: Add system field. Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45020 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: dannym@scratchpost.org, 45020@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 45020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45020.160750967317451 (code B ref 45020); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:28:01 +0000 Received: (at 45020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2020 10:27:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwhM-0004XP-OI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:27:52 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:55610) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwhJ-0004XC-Vg for 45020@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:27:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [31.210.180.46]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 219E4402FD; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:27:41 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: References: <20201203105353.149482-1-othacehe@gnu.org> <87tusvz3nf.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gcEbErudAFx+ZRn+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tusvz3nf.fsf@gnu.org> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.41 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4A67D940111 X-Spam-Score: -2.41 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: 8kiua9LmRCCq --gcEbErudAFx+ZRn+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:15:32AM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >=20 > Hello Efraim, >=20 > > I'm not sure about i686-linux being an efi-raw type. I always assumed > > they were all not EFI. >=20 > The "efi-raw" image type is actually an hybrid image type supporting EFI > and BIOS legacy boot methods. >=20 > Maybe we should then rename "raw" to "bios-efi-raw" or > "bios-efi-hybrid-raw", what do you think? My hope is to eventually produce an image for mips64el again, which would need an ext2 formatted /boot partition. I'm hoping to make it not too hard to hack that in in the future :) Perhaps it makes sense to name them according to the architecture more? we have arm32-raw and aarch64-raw, how about i686-raw and x86_64-raw? Make it clear exactly what architecures they target. Then we can continue with the hybrid bios/efi images anyway. > Thanks, >=20 > Mathieu --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --gcEbErudAFx+ZRn+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl/QppoACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EsfQ//eZC07dXC7NPASn5bvRfYw7z2KJD10BrHGLpHaunnSfafV1NEdXd0UAc6 H4khsMIv8u2DKTxrpPjyHRDruKhMOqAW1xffAVb1nq95+T8Dk0w3W6LTUfBSGAbg rfNRkis86k8UoGFBiuQxf33kQKamX4ILRNgPOIn3CKF4b9d6ilV/vkPfSkCRrn9n sORySVbVpyMvMCr4v3+Xwk24DI5Mc1CB8QpRDi+hY3QObWZwQZNv/LNw4I8yvZwu VtM0VkWK9uIG4QTwPMYFRF6EDdDqY/T34PbP2QW63huT2KfEAofT9UXFzX2TVXc7 GMmBEnAbQsLMBM/Cir53/csOvAoKOFUsY2vIro3sjhH/Jk1nzs5M+rG7bZq/1dJ1 wRBZHZXg5bbMs3ttxF8PW0mVVqoE1jCbeU3T4hsYFfbIPQLKA8rYoS0Zo0yhp/vU cdnTtM0cOfndhoGYpCzDHCob/zeE4qwF+FdanQzcLMJ3BC91qnyo9HRCjL89K8F/ GdKT/m6K/HGrrrL/+C8VoHAEKu5vX4FpkElWlOBubUEVFaRI1ksdPlSNiYr944tb SrqflBHu7psVkwgaxPc3/pABdTPiJp+z4eX9DZ6/Aiu1ThUCxda4qloq0zi4XfdN voKFyNcjF7SdMWs6aSZNrt+5ZoWotlLh9YHAn3w60mIO4nNegHs= =fult -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gcEbErudAFx+ZRn+--