From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 7sszII4N5V+4eQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:52:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id aF2SG44N5V8zcQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:52:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F0A9403CD for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksYWq-0004OI-VE for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:52:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksYWh-0004OB-1c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:52:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksYWg-0007FC-L3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksYWg-0001kX-JI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45405] [PATCH] gnu: Update Xfce base to 4.16.0. Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45405 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Michael Rohleder Received: via spool by 45405-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45405.16088467006696 (code B ref 45405); Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 45405) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2020 21:51:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksYWK-0001jw-D4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:51:40 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:43235) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksYWH-0001jh-OF for 45405@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:51:38 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A025C00AF; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:51:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:51:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=+yI88cwIQ5fksHCtyMwgkYru qtrF1LEEMnzxRLci6OU=; b=l7XAvqYiCWswbYf5FXv4jAra2nH2diMR1GBgwaI3 cEXaTUylLQ8RSUtMLp+7neFV5nBB8sMCZ0GTkZUSrg5mWYSRPK2lhb8Ypw24Q1sy vJ95pYfAYh78HUkkhRonmACgnCnSnQN37ZSf+SVIzF3XydQfUhWjOPdJ/eMnp5tG Hg0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+yI88c wIQ5fksHCtyMwgkYruqtrF1LEEMnzxRLci6OU=; b=BTXENYcyeJRK3OW0viPfV+ cXH+lYs2LIdh1TMlss2FlLQjukC/Tr2K/5T6osdpWFew9e8QVhv8nc4yRO4qYZ3+ A7d/HKoc9C7SMu5L0ZAVYyEcsMxZxw1ilx+8SHEmP2GyedTrTCY1tcrvLzY6a1Fn YTp+hiG8LyLVE/1zxBtkr3UkWk3k9529jSj0qLsEF4KgbYDpf55UNrqsAygQFNwX 6xDSbFjqSYcxfSyzwZT8e4DVDkg64qLtbabEXN1nBkf861xGrGD0ej2bUPuLr9IZ +CZzL97ZLuUI9rSQhMwBcTxH4gdEnhpuSxXPUCbLMuQAul9UGc6Bkb0pnlkTR28A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvddtledgudehhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhf eufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffevgfenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddu geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EE2C21080064; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:51:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:51:30 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <20201224132146.25275-1-mike@rohleder.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201224132146.25275-1-mike@rohleder.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45405@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.32 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=l7XAvqYi; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=BTXENYcy; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 04F0A9403CD X-Spam-Score: -1.32 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: lss6XIi8462F On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:21:46PM +0100, Michael Rohleder wrote: > * gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfdesktop): Update to 4.16.0. [...] > Tested with some vm-images and xfce-plugins. As far as I can tell, it looks good ;) Thanks for the work and for telling us how tested it! > I couldn't get the test for xfconf run, so I disabled it. If someone(TM) wants > to take a look... (I'm a bit exhausted) Okay. When your energy is renewed, can you send a message saying what goes wrong and what you tried? > Random Thoughts/Notes: > Sooner or later we need the xfce-dev-tools packaged, because I tried building > xfce4-xkb-plugin from upstream master and noticed it needs it. > (Maybe the xfconf test is also supposed to run with it). Could it be that xfce-dev-tools is needed when building from VCS, but not for "real" releases? > Also, I noticed that debian sid has added a new pkg xfce4-helper yesterday. Maybe > something like this could be a good idea for us too... What would that xfce4-helper package do? I couldn't find the new package on Debian's web site.