From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YNkQJC7Vvl61YAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:45:18 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WHPYHy7Vvl6vfAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:45:18 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51D794001C for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35182 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOY-000423-OP for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:45:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOM-00040V-M0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:45:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOM-0006Cc-Cl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:45:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOM-0002Ao-A1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41263] [PATCH] gnu: Add openctm Resent-From: Ekaitz Zarraga Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 17:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41263 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: "41263-done@debbugs.gnu.org" <41263-done@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 41263-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D41263.15895646978315 (code D ref 41263); Fri, 15 May 2020 17:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 41263-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2020 17:44:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOG-0002A3-VY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:44:57 -0400 Received: from mail1.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.18]:12272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOF-00029q-UU for 41263-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:44:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 17:44:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=protonmail; t=1589564689; bh=eZdkak3EqLFKffVlZae6ULrSwsxsD/bcfsAFUHRqZRs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ukLT4Bc8kNjvOIVV18GUZGuyM+/DSJpXeyPK8Ouv70LdtuhdR3u4H185P1dBwO8kS P27Lh0YStOfdXULFVWGWG35Gxgz+nhe50gZAouAmZG0YQZRc9eggnPj/pgBc1XHfb7 8ExlLmfnedg77eIYWlKdnQJ/gYgXP9wESRYtjtHk= From: Ekaitz Zarraga Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87eerltskn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eerltskn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ekaitz Zarraga Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=elenq.tech header.s=protonmail header.b=ukLT4Bc8; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=elenq.tech (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: VcbkvFMerfjz Hi, =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Friday, May 15, 2020 12:12 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > Hi, > > Ekaitz Zarraga ekaitz@elenq.tech skribis: > > > > From 8bbac5bccdb0b2fd5ffa8fe1e2dec25a6a359810 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200= 1 > > > From: Ekaitz Zarraga ekaitz@elenq.tech > > > Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:55:32 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openctm > > > > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (openctm): New Variable. > > > > Applied with the cosmetic changes below, mostly indentation (consider > running ./etc/indent-code.el as mentioned in the manual). > > Thanks! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Thanks for the help Ludo (and the motivation!). I was wondering about if it's worth to separate the package in multiple out= puts like: GUI for openctm files, openctm library and so on, as described h= ere: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs.htm= l#Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs It has like a `tools` part and a `lib` part I'd say. Does it make sense for= this package? It would avoid using GTK in the library part I think. I never did this before but looks like an option to reduce the package size= (total: 830.2 MiB reported by guix size O_O). Opinions? Thanks!