From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id IJ5RE2UKsWDhZQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:21:09 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yD+PDmUKsWC9AgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:21:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C76A9AF for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34920 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmeIN-0001EA-1l for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:21:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmeII-0001Ds-Uv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:21:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43627) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmeII-0006L3-Mn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmeII-0005MW-Hl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#48637] [PATCH] website: Add publications page Resent-From: Luis Felipe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48637 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: "48637@debbugs.gnu.org" <48637@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 48637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48637.162221523320554 (code B ref 48637); Fri, 28 May 2021 15:21:02 +0000 Received: (at 48637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2021 15:20:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmeHp-0005LS-Bh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:20:33 -0400 Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.135]:29372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmeHm-0005LC-AX for 48637@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:20:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:20:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1622215223; bh=I6BDs78UIC5jAu1snrHydKcgWvVq12ppS9YIhNRhV4c=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EMH/3XdNPzfemNEsk9vb6y0/8XV641+uB0ODa9kSxyWD2PpTxKrUiaaVwZnp63qad WOnxCJXbpJJaJ6rDkyT1RQ4PtxWvLRKwvOdkSSECJOhRztnpA2UqTOxNKQ1iEjl1tw Lv/7UATXRM3Xdpx8zQ/OJjTuvzDVG276IvqbseaM= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87bl8vi0d8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4BtcqLwBY7LgeYhUd41lhUUAcT5n2Zn9OTJUzGswTuBpLla8nBHyrQ3kJzwEMI9E7MPEnr6wBqSeCMqByldZ6i5jPR8B7ZtEi0XhwextyQo=@protonmail.com> <87bl8vi0d8.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Luis Felipe X-ACL-Warn: , Luis Felipe via Guix-patches From: Luis Felipe via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1622215269; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=I6BDs78UIC5jAu1snrHydKcgWvVq12ppS9YIhNRhV4c=; b=nwcUhoXAy4XOFh1VjCmCfOHkrM0QxfOlpd7KQ2nHfNH6GaS00bk4hhZ0skwk3pGeILrhWk end4nh4Rgy04E3j/O8QOvHWRA+l8G3MIqtoTdNNccXSOi0xeYZzIPk14sw8DAwJBJfQ2NF kcts5x65h5Uo3tbJFSmARZdjMh97K4cPeHdMUfa/HxNtrCK9lsc1Hl+9DtjMdX0Nr/8Sn9 0MKeaqHepIsQUGxWfg/qAC5XYtQnSdyqz4dPgt0VTwC33E15EPyr562mfM4+riC1WEvoP1 gV87WKDtH0ozVPBGgr210B8jvD3ycOq7S++W/azegz15CPgWnl+68gNVBpyurA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1622215269; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qis34TM9a3lyTJnwc9EOdQFKIrkYHJFZ1Gfh8Dm5dbbbwp7msj8+MhAHbNWhkZNxVfzcfR 1XmLZPRZI8+v5si0Flf2VV+zOlL1TwQwtYiBwzmWYH5KZtI9Kzz5HsdjAkNf1zM5U2zE7Z g66T0NGVHsrBZMiPICc2Df5iZ6x75XmL0GRMRU43JO+pSgdzWz5w0/84AQ5s9J7LP8Pk/Y Z5wqKcIjud9ucn18tNkqK/guY3lkEt9tmIhEYgV2E1N7WHsv01LRE2d1c6W6e1mkWr8SeG jMhGYYlF70vLQf+P2MA0mplgMu1RsmxfO++jPnrb2CGRiIh8Snb5SctTS442sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b="EMH/3XdN"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.93 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b="EMH/3XdN"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B3C76A9AF X-Spam-Score: -2.93 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: E/yV9oKZ5Qod Hi Ludovic, On Friday, May 28, 2021 11:06 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > Hi Luis, > > Nice work! It=E2=80=99s now on-line: > > https://guix.gnu.org/en/publications/ Thanks. > I see that you want to keep it open to non-academic publications, which > is a good idea. Yeah, I went with Julien's idea. > I wonder if there should be a visual distinction > between peer-reviewed scientific articles, journal articles, and other > types of publications? Yeah, now that you mention it, I think that would be good. > I started adding historical LWN articles (patch below; the titles look > funny in hindsight :-)), and wondered whether this was a good idea since > they would come first in the list. > > Thoughts? > > We should call for contributions because I=E2=80=99m sure there are quite= a few > articles that would be worth adding. Did you forget the patch? :)