From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wINRKdzeaV+1YgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:24:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wAJAJdzeaV+OUgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:24:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E36E09402A6 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43238 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKgP3-0004od-Uc for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:24:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKgOw-0004oM-I5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:24:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKgOw-0007k5-8Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKgOw-0006zk-3d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43427] [PATCH] gnu: zstd: Update to 1.4.5. Resent-From: Greg Hogan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43427 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 43427@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43427-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43427.160077378326808 (code B ref 43427); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 43427) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2020 11:23:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKgNy-0006yK-Uw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:23:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:38704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKgNw-0006xc-NV for 43427@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:23:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id d20so18594049qka.5 for <43427@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:23:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ws4DbkV0LC0LG/k9mu4sCgNS5cE7kXmTb5DuAcX/2SQ=; b=1Mk0E3aBBlpEXSFBskHy21F+xrMX8BEUNZXiuj8LEmVuLibS2DTIyIkBE857sCwePw JxhlfsuaJ01tzDXExWMcPNQoqOcEm4frnVZWibpUxWbgeEAVUK91VOlYyckRRSJWEgD6 /NfIBctE3O5Uah3IUQVfUH1BHt7pk4ISzYCGYFFTP0KytxXocmbOLBNEq98R9PDh89/J XQTCgA0glrZWbZr0mmvNNZ6BiJsrRE2aOWPaPUg8z3xCjseOUdi77kf68MLJ4I7uO8GK xIN46/ov6lMx52UDxd2Q4O7zmkPUkwFNsyDJtlxjCxIPYS88ag9rV3SKPL3iCaOlg0wU /utw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ws4DbkV0LC0LG/k9mu4sCgNS5cE7kXmTb5DuAcX/2SQ=; b=FDshMOwp1Z02NzSkX3W6XZiI4FPoaCYUkfM8mhRdmuJCP54rhtNc8lyg8DJ8OoiJEw g6gkcMCeNQw1Ernf51rXXEGVI6YH7xXhnZEd+vnuyCHaRGUjxlIH0KH9epwrTp5nECro 4c+BTwZt5kb+F6sKTJnjuioJrQwGT1kzaJMuqvOKMwmastQ85j5Td6f78YdERB1+Ksh9 94tCUtoJHXQm6Y+zoOOHvmK8OfPWq17cdNOGruadOWb+FPpl+lMkHXeJytjkMZtYc6Vh djjE5rTdoJOY/I8mVIzLdmNMw9YwI0IugWXaMQCciVlKk4ybAEwnbhwJeSta1vurN5x9 lhAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fqfC/1Hizq03Opvz7VMIp/IhEn2annyjdc38XyijfeAR7oAHO CYt6GkZlRMJu90DuQkrP5QzRbnyqsDPsoLJS X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylD0KfJpusgZBRWvFZlRncnDzKJN2bTLjCWqNeVNEeZKwjCx9bEvhNz92oWDvDMP+5f9uVKA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:13da:: with SMTP id g26mr3992600qkl.291.1600773775013; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.25] (pool-173-69-176-48.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.69.176.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t140sm11447611qke.125.2020.09.22.04.22.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) From: Greg Hogan In-Reply-To: <87sgbaw2ri.fsf@nckx> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:22:52 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87wo0myy9j.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgbaw2ri.fsf@nckx> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=greghogan-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=1Mk0E3aB; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.49 X-TUID: S2m7eQIkELD0 Thanks, T-G-R. I will endeavor to tag for staging and core-updates going = forward. Not sure how I missed the prior commit. I may have been looking = among patches. Not sure how I missed the git log, and in the future I = will be certain to simply check the latest version from each branch. Would it be feasible to have `guix refresh` consider staging and = core-updates when reporting available updates? Greg > On Sep 22, 2020, at 5:59 AM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice = wrote: >=20 > Greg, >=20 > Mathieu Othacehe =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> The update is already present on core-updates branch, >=20 > Sorry for the duplicate work! How were you to've known this, you ask? >=20 > $ guix refresh --list-dependent PACKAGE >=20 > or =E2=80=98-l=E2=80=99 for short will list the number of rebuilds = that a hash change in PACKAGE would trigger. >=20 > If it's higher than 300, the patch belongs on the =E2=80=98staging=E2=80= =99 or =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 branches instead of =E2=80=98master=E2= =80=99. The exact numbers are in the =E2=80=98Submitting Patches=E2=80=99= section of the Guix manual. >=20 > In practice, it's not always clear-cut. A patch that rebuilds fewer = than 300 packages but includes IceCat, Ungoogled Chromium, and = LibreOffice probably belongs on =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 regardless. A = patch that rebuilds 350 (fast-building) Perl packages might be OK for = master. >=20 > It's good practice to include the branch name (e.g., =E2=80=98[PATCH = core-updates]=E2=80=99) when submitting patches not suitable for master. >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > T G-R