From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hAYtf-0007Cp-KD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 07:45:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hAYtd-0000Kh-Eu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 07:45:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hAYta-0000Jn-5v for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 07:45:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hAYta-0003lH-0V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 07:45:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#34523] Add tetrinet References: Resent-Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 12:44:39 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <8C712D22-F104-4594-9404-8C2C4DD8B485@riseup.net> Message-Id: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: swedebugia Cc: 34523 <34523@debbugs.gnu.org> So I looked at the PureOS page for Tetrinet (https://software.pureos.net/pa= ckage/source/landing/tetrinet) and the "VCS browser" links to a git reposit= ory for Tetrinet which is served via https: https://repo.or.cz/tetrinet.git= , this is linked to on the frontpage of http://tetrinet.or.cz (a link to th= e README) file, so I'll change the source to use this instead. On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:03:50 +0100, swedebugia wrot= e: > pkill9@runbox.com skrev: (27 februari 2019 15:11:20 CET) > >The Tetrinet maintainer added an SHA1 file: > >http://tetrinet.or.cz/download/tetrinet-0.11.tar.bz2.sha1 > > > >On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:10:46 +0000 (GMT), wrote: > > > >> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on > >that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that > >you got the code unaltered?=20 > >>=20 > >> Ok I emailed the current maintainer according to that page asking to > >verify that I got the source code unaltered, and to maybe update the > >page with that info. > >>=20 > >> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:45:23 +0100, swedebugia > > wrote: > >>=20 > >> > pkill9@runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:20:28 CET) > >> > >Hi Swedebugia, > >> > > > >> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis: > >> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to > >six > >> > >people." > >> > >>=20 > >> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this > >is a > >> > >> console/text-mode client. > >> > > > >> > >What does 'WP' mean? > >> > > > >> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the > >homepage > >> > >of > >> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own > >server > >> > >with > >> > >> jetrix though. > >> > > > >> > >I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember > >what > >> > >the address was. > >> > > > >> > >You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access > >> > >http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated > >in > >> > >ages? > >> > > > >> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see > >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company > >> > > > >> > >Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved > >distros > >> > >Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so > >I > >> > >think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright > >> > >claim is made in the future it can always be removed. > >> > > > >> > >[1] Tetrinet in Parabola - > >https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=3Dtetrinet > >> > >[2] Tetrinet in PureOS - > >> > >https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=3Dtetrinet > >> > > > >> > >Thanks > >> > > > >> > >On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia > > > >> > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote: > >> > >> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching > >synopsies I > >> > >> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours. > >> > >> > --=20 > >> > >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android. > >> > >>=20 > >> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis: > >> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to > >six > >> > >people." > >> > >>=20 > >> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this > >is a > >> > >> console/text-mode client. > >> > >>=20 > >> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the > >homepage > >> > >of > >> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own > >server > >> > >with > >> > >> jetrix though. > >> > >>=20 > >> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see > >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company > >> > >>=20 > >> > >> --=20 > >> > >> Cheers Swedebugia > >> >=20 > >> > Hi=20 > >> > I agree with your remarks > >> > WP =3D wikipedia=20 > >> >=20 > >> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on > >that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that > >you got the code unaltered?=20 > >> > --=20 > >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android. >=20 > Good, did you point out that http is easy to spoof? >=20 > If they are serious about application and distribution security they real= ly should enable https. >=20 > I had the same issue with another maintainer serving a hash over http. I = asked him over email if my hash was correct. This is not perfect out of ban= d but given most email providers post snowden now use starttls and enforce = https it is better than nothing. >=20 > Assuming it is tainted is my default stance with http. I would rather not= use it at all and would like a browser that drops it or issue a dire warni= ng when encountered.=20 > --=20 > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.