From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id KFgdEpzv72Jc6AAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 19:00:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id ICMzEZzv72LzOwEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 19:00:12 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07693A19A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 19:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59518 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKjdL-0008CX-2z for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 13:00:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKjdC-0008CB-Gh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 13:00:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKjdC-00064x-5g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 13:00:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oKjdB-0001QL-VQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 13:00:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#57034] [PATCH] gnu: packages: Add miniz. Resent-From: "(" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 17:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57034 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: "Liliana Marie Prikler" , <57034@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 57034-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57034.16598915655401 (code B ref 57034); Sun, 07 Aug 2022 17:00:01 +0000 Received: (at 57034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2022 16:59:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oKjcb-0001P2-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 12:59:25 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:40692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oKjcZ-0001Ot-Fh for 57034@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 12:59:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B2D4505B; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 18:59:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kP1xQ5M597sO; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 18:59:20 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1659891560; bh=i4pKiiFRXVlhd/+8bXjQ7IZGQMfxZtfLU3i7Y+XFgKo=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=Xmy7TP0dW5LkM/YzxLiq02BzotEB+5F0SuJszafGy9CUpWwu7siC5d5eQKSkx//dO OO6j6vakIvwzYapbRUa5IYIN2FX1BXZFJ4IRxJLoHers9jCZ4NZcBR9/+f2JQ9U9gp /TAqns/t4pTQiLLBKsQfIXEa03eVWbqUd5oX0wsFdWEqiMQi3y456vEXS6WGfcU+PL qmKwaDfAj44AotpJwTGtimg2dltibwOsdr2epjHyNTo9EcMssdwb8Pd9rNRfWz2bGF 3seDnnJwTz1LBgN8JKNbRZUTTrQk5Zrkrn3MLwnIeVchnwEuKg/E8ZFlsZQqLjFLlV UWgp9FbsxWtjg== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 17:59:19 +0100 Message-Id: References: <20220807120201.19970-1-paren@disroot.org> <1c8bc45b27083d351e3930006c51675e00d3d15b.camel@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1c8bc45b27083d351e3930006c51675e00d3d15b.camel@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: "\(" X-ACL-Warn: , "\( via Guix-patches" From: "\( via Guix-patches" via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1659891612; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=A64ON2Px0M+LiKQ52gGIF0bK/YyJJVHZbzH04U62Puk=; b=DZDzJCspVYJmTlDyui7h6NN1I0VY0D1sH+k72gyRzPcfLJeWQH+/qWwq188dErRJgH6Ycl 2LEtgaeiv229X1gZ+t8sR0WQTeEgv0uXVubIo1zLgI1quLQMeO9REBYq94b7jHOo2d7SG2 RNEP7aQS/fIBU7jNoPnZ8RJ6rsXfqNCHyMIVdLUJ5xZtaeWrMezw7CXwuk0rUwcVaI88HP b2+Gn4xF4vvrJRS/DaOMlg2DhXB88pTc9RljzqGmjICjsLIaItTodb3PZbAXgTQOUg93Ay ua7ZgLQsDgAbm1BILF0SW7uk1zUovM3xVyyOLdc/IzInAAEk7/Pu/2h3mgsluA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1659891612; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ipuK2RLRAqROCUGR7f6YBQWBB8rqDdH1slUSXcwm8wNdqjy5QTwl1l1bEbP2enhrxACKuH pAQrJG8retSjyAH3BjZtRMOfHuDTPCIWfU+fDTFHDlArhENeaqiWKDxcUs5ngWEsKMuD9X jKoBva4SMehgwc4GtOwFBge1j/JXWfce2GwEGUPJDEkWvPmrJ0Op09cf8chjMmP8thCWSd RjDhD7CFaSGDsXSTvngwZm0B65eWLh4SMrmzBCVb+VHlgvbcy87BBNpZZbBN2IjinhucjN 8XD72nIQt6ZprmgnKTVrw6J/pwjKsknyQlFamy5dCCP8m6l5weSewt9IOi8+Kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=Xmy7TP0d; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.69 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=Xmy7TP0d; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 07693A19A X-Spam-Score: -2.69 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: fnjjcFsoyxHX On Sun Aug 7, 2022 at 5:42 PM BST, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > last time I checked, the template was "gnu: Add PACKAGE", not "gnu: > packages: Add PACKAGE." Okay, I'll remember that for next time :) > And there might still be many more until a release. I don't think > using untagged commits "just because" if the latest release is barely a > year old is a good idea. > > +=C2=A0 (let ((commit "be92575500f71dfb5ac7b0c5bb47b6e736c23039") > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (revision "0")) > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (package > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (name "miniz") > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (version (git-version "2.2.0" revision commit= )) > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (source (origin > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 (method git-fetch) > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 (uri (git-reference > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (url "https://github.com/rich= gel999/miniz") > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (commit commit))) > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 (file-name (git-file-name name version)) > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 (sha256 > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (base32 > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 > > "0w42vagcv4b0hcf0jk7vamrcpmw62dblx9856j98msdfm3qv1xzi")))) > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (build-system cmake-build-system) > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (arguments > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (list #:configure-flags > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 #~(= list "-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=3DON") > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ;; = No test target. > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 #:t= ests? #f)) > There is a test script you could use. It doesn't work; I tried it. > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 "@code{miniz} is a small, simple altern= ative to the > > @code{zlib} > > +data compression library for manipulating zlib, DEFLATE, PNG, and > > ZIP > > +files from C.") > Avoid marketing terms :) Do 'small' and 'simple' count as marketing terms? 'smaller than zlib' is objective fact, and 'simpler than zlib' is subjective but pretty obvious. Maybe I could rewrite it to say 'smaller, simpler alternative' instead? -- (