From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Qmd-0001Hx-Eg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:57:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Qmc-0005Gt-GK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:57:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Qmc-0005Gd-6w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:57:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Qmc-0003RF-2S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:57:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39309] [PATCH WIP] gnu: add stack. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87k14vou0u.fsf@ngyro.com> <87y2t6ayax.fsf@ngyro.com> <875zg78fcm.fsf@ngyro.com> In-Reply-To: <875zg78fcm.fsf@ngyro.com> From: John Soo Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:56:23 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Timothy Sample Cc: 39309@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Tim, > At this point, it might be worth joining the Nix folks on that issue, > and suggesting a patch to Cabal to call =E2=80=9Chsc2hs=E2=80=9D with ded= uplicated > flags. It will help that the other deduplication code was written by > the same person who filed the bug you linked to earlier. Once the patch > lands, we can apply it to our Cabal and then Stack will build. Yay! Sorry I'm a bit confused by all this. I guess if we can rely on a patch into cabal that would be the least effort, right? Is there already a patch to deduplicate flags passed to hsc2hs? Do we need to comment anywhere or express support? - John