Em seg., 22 de fev. de 2021 às 07:04, Nicolas Goaziou escreveu: > The trend in other distributions is to use luajit-openresty, in this > order. So maybe luajit-lua52-openresty? Or luajit-openresty if that is > unambiguous. It is not a big issue anyway. luajit-openresty might be ambiguous as not every package might depend on the lua52 configure flag, so I renamed it to luajit-lua52-openresty. > Could you send this to this ML using git format-patch? You may find the patch with the requested fixes attached to this email. I'll implement the changes to the other package once we have luajit-lua52-openresty in place. Thanks for acting as the reviewer of this patch. -- Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira https://vinipsmaker.github.io/