From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibktv-0002nN-3b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:34:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibktu-00048U-2z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:34:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibktt-00048G-Vl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:34:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibktt-0002qY-Rx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:34:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#38455] [PATCH] doc: Mention how to test against make / guix pull breakage. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191202091550.15132-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> <875ziyly6n.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-Reply-To: <875ziyly6n.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 13:32:50 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 38455@debbugs.gnu.org On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 13:16, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > I'm actually not sure about one thing: Does `guix pull` catch the errors > of `make`? What is the point of this advice? Check if "guix pull" is broken, right? I think "guix pull -n --url=foo" does the job, isn't it? > I believe that make can output useful warnings, which maybe not bother > `guix pull`, but maybe I'm wrong. This is another tips? Reading all the points, I feel that another point about checking the "make" warnings and/or running the test suite should be added. A good indication is that there is no link to "Running the Test Suite". What do you think?