From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40341)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j8gjB-0006HA-7o
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 03:47:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j8gj9-0004KF-EZ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 03:47:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59537)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j8gj9-0004K7-9k
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 03:47:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j8gj9-0007or-8c
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 03:47:03 -0500
Subject: [bug#39798] [PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39798.B39798.158313876529907@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200226113442.9798-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87r1yhi5t6.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0a08o34.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <87d0a08o34.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:45:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ3p+JWyZEhTdJRGBPeWWOKwcYX5wdP0pS7UAHK-+30FUA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>, 39798@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Pierre,

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 08:52, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> > Haskell package upgrades need to be consistent according to the current
> > LTS.  We can=E2=80=99t just upgrade some Haskell packages without upgra=
ding them
> > all.  They also cannot be upgraded to the latest version as that may be
> > higher than the LTS version.
>
> I'm new to Haskell packaging.  Where do I find the LTS versions?
> Can we update pandoc then?

I am not closely following the Haskell packaging in Guix, but you
should find the LTS versions there:
https://www.stackage.org/
It is better to upgrade all the Haskell packages (compiler included)
to stay compliant with the LTS, otherwise it should become a mess
falling in the Cabal Hell.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal_(software)#Criticism


Hope that helps.
simon