From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46997)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1in5KF-0004CR-Ka
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 13:36:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1in5KE-0005a6-MY
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 13:36:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34035)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1in5KE-0005Z9-Iv
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 13:36:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1in5KE-0004cT-Fw
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 13:36:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#38846] [PATCH 4/4] DRAFT doc: Add a cooption policy for commit
 access.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38846.B38846.157799014417733@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200101163446.5132-1-ludo@gnu.org>
 <20200101163446.5132-4-ludo@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ33cJ0W834Rw=wka27hqzqWAhRv6NXniXVi=QWssa9YuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87y2uqul9n.fsf@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87y2uqul9n.fsf@gnu.org>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:35:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ35Bo-Qo3xXWg6cYSpH4wi0P2fG3RJ2P2+UaSV1hNv3pA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 38846@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Ludo,

On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 at 12:53, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

> > I find inappropriate the "Stay tuned!" in the manual.
>
> Because it=E2=80=99s too informal, or because it=E2=80=99s confusing?  (T=
he former is
> fine with me.)

Maybe a bit of both. :-)

It is an analogy, but I feel the same than if I read a manual of maths
with "stay tuned" after a theorem as the proof. I feel in the same
time not enough formal for a manual and I am confused: is it already
proved and not written down yet or is it not proven yet?

Well, it is my feedback when I read it. :-)
And I feel cutting the hair in small pieces... French bias. ;-)


Thank you for the initiative. Cool!

All the best,
simon