From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j8py3-0006fq-0g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:39:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j8py2-0005UX-3e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:39:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j8py2-0005UQ-0W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:39:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j8py1-0004hm-Uu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:39:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#39258] [PATCH 0/4] Xapian for Guix package search Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200227204150.30985-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87eeuf5dty.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:37:50 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Pierre Neidhardt , 39258@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Arun, Do you have some benchmark in mind? On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 17:05, Arun Isaac wrote: > ./pre-inst-env guix pull --url=$PWD --branch=xapian -p /tmp/test We need to benchmark on different machines the new "guix pull". Well, it is nothing compared to the derivation computations. :-) And more importantly, 'make as-derivations' to avoid a "guix pull" breakage, Then on cold caches, the new "guix search" for a couple of query. There is no so much inspiration in tests/. :-) Ah do not forget to adapt some tests. All the best, simon