From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id Qef3MNVzNmAGBAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:42:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id SMZMLNVzNmAzfgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:42:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7721277E9 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:42:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60930 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwIl-0002s7-R0 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:42:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwId-0002qR-6j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:42:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwIc-0004KM-VL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:42:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwIc-0007aq-Rn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46643] Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46643 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter , 46643@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@xsteve.at Cc: 46643-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46643-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46643.161418126929094 (code B ref 46643); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 46643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 15:41:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35508 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwHk-0007ZA-MR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:41:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:37570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwHj-0007Yw-R4; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:41:08 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id n28so993607qkk.4; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:41:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xkp8o9y3Xc4mUvjyUgrLclGV61chjCQuWwKJSV5qVZg=; b=fxd0CsAX7RUgRFmEUTC1j34hN33Zd/qUJ+AhVjpakUuitcwNp/pKErU15EOVvqfl2x hvdD8ue2/B6Y9rxpgT/T/usjcao7d5kktoNFlY1CGPXVsgpWFVgEHPEemw8R3d8Ta5YL Qla4rmxHVmqABBIRV34HDzCwFU5Atez24W1hoDciBJqQ9uwA644QI7BRx6db3JYAFI5x ApZKY36/rrB9tvjiqUuqMUiAwLO5xukcCHFEGDbE+M3dTQEkDaAcSEDXsHYmAyC33fGE 9v+7LcMXu1QchxbR90O7womgwD7ULQHZoT0oTkmV+nWe7DzIWA4pg8csEmdjicO0QJVN w63Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xkp8o9y3Xc4mUvjyUgrLclGV61chjCQuWwKJSV5qVZg=; b=IRtvu27y1EX+R/SdRp3XuvlkqJYjTZcvEpF05In30Ub08l9xxY66Zsd/zfyoPBcRPL Vpc96lX+FsCqM6gPHp5B2jjc7y5xIpDVtAULKTiIm5XJB4SuCmiEA0VrLm0tiA5UNz43 A/fFaIssehOWPVJ7JGA7sval3tDZqs7K65voU0daafPSrHf8VILz3sHy2AltcAgLtr7j DjIyEzsMcYUMxiJLq67TysjSCyqfdH6/XOn6HeDr++eoEdWAG6uslFgDOcq+zpr88F+y 0jdmPGZoVVWTqMIYZn85UPJ8GUuZX/m5GHZ0OxIMWQEK3VdV7pcmuwcwodltDq8qZPzi 5ASw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qNrmySLfzTBp9mNRzTZkWEQXrJ39j9iQDzzPRqJuB59HwfdRN 4zU6iLdgHfCYjDSnyk6mpLN+T/l1eDOSeL2q6Cw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+da5QsLrtQcwiA0YPnwf19+Nn/qazTn1W2j4faqOvR0PzLjkyjaM9RPVHF0Ra2ZfPvtSnmNGVbJigMwlI+yM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:908:: with SMTP id v8mr32488176qkv.201.1614181262228; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:41:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210219200427.105200-1-stefan@xsteve.at> <1fb2ba44f701f4bf10876deb73a3d45cb4b53e9b.camel@zaclys.net> In-Reply-To: <1fb2ba44f701f4bf10876deb73a3d45cb4b53e9b.camel@zaclys.net> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:40:50 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.77 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fxd0CsAX; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B7721277E9 X-Spam-Score: -0.77 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: KCSir4GK1paK Hi L=C3=A9o, On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 15:28, L=C3=A9o Le Bouter via Guix-patches via wrote: > Also, your upgrade of ghc-protolude broke the purescript build which > depends on ghc-protolude<0.2.4 so I created a secondary ghc-protolude- > 0.2 package that purescript now depends on. Usually, IIUC, the Haskell packages follows one LTS. And there are updated in one go to avoid the Cabal Hell. Well, the current %default-lts-version is 14.27 which has protolude at 0.2.3 [1]. LTS 14.27 supports GHC 8.6 which is the default current ghc in Guix. Using LTS 17.4 seems a bad idea since it supports GHC 8.10 which is not yet included in Guix. Therefore, ghc-protolude should not be updated and ghc-protolude-0.2 should not be added, neither. Or I am missing something. Except corner cases, please keep the Haskell packages consistent with one LTS. The linter should warn about this but it does not; I have not investigated why. If greenclip cannot be built with ghc-protolude@0.2.3, please let the "define-public ghc-protolude" at 0.2.3 and instead define ghc-protolude-0.3. As it is done for ghc-atomic-write or ghc-generic-random or ghc-prettyprinter or ghc-repline. Thanks, simon 1: