From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id MK8fFS9ZX2eUeAEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:33:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id MK8fFS9ZX2eUeAEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 23:33:19 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=KW6ehguz; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=jbTux957; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1734301998; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=3eIuSrI6OOe8XVcTXYq5bY3UfSseo7XpN3AU8tZxA/s=; b=tdnGkb/EgiyTPZZkwyvDKBhC3Giw122TaF7Res+wP4vIhejBGUW5GgkNdHN2QPBm23Kfn4 bQXMp7L5xMwhz7uzUfIgsgIRU3tghufXI70cUTozfQ20a4VjwP3oxD3A6HRzxXkyr9wamZ p0vVvXY009eTg6FVIwrhGatuFWoNIgvH16LIVVW3OvsbT+NKsWBRQJJqV95wZ8JQ9LD9iQ CAkpMPc+AoPu21y4216iUFAcGTH/X4TJ7C0gF8/roBK9KHPNh1/8TggA37HLpt572JbjuR RSKGd+ENxBLWgbbKvTPU+zZBSqv8K9tsG5z/wbu8NuL4vSyKMxOQKExfaeMF8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=KW6ehguz; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=jbTux957; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1734301998; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=nUpi2EK01Qpa8Z0HVSMsXjWD0mVSXLOnKMrMEo0pgZT3iVmvuTltVs3O0qlwlm8aVNYm4s ClGakjLWxhT68XWI5b5UbpEjGhj7k95l2qGK31iunQkmv0c9e1l0dyRR9oyohnOsdrZxi1 VuBvq/XiPRHKl0Dnf8NgbJMkNcwYyqs5lBWY/NUXUmBb6wn/l6zpiBFFc0LmgduMX4MUEW tFU4Df09IXbGrguIhr233QwWPlEAE501sabne60eAUZdlLiStdnoPyxJM3QgqjOxKL2P9X UrizsNNXLkv2L34TsTZTnqBPS31RZQFlWyqY/6q3TrtSh5P8ydyyp3FK6PRLyQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94045CE34 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 23:33:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tMxAe-0006bB-6T; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 17:33:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tMxAc-0006ae-PB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 17:33:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tMxAc-0007hx-Gi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 17:33:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:To:Subject; bh=3eIuSrI6OOe8XVcTXYq5bY3UfSseo7XpN3AU8tZxA/s=; b=KW6ehguzbpMQje+dnipTSCQdhXjICaiqoWIJYN9Wb8ussUIydfdSsKVw99KilJhcaCT0Z9P+jl0UDLNKyzZy0c2b0ixkIogf3WWrd5J8YZVuHBOtNrYM70fmXwbUroP5pfMFfSWfzv4/JFY920zUBlA8XbCJGa8BL/S9qEndWFgjNMTON1N6eyhf3SLCi0RtuvKKGHz9WdoA1RU+hLvJNSEjXpY4RkqfU7Or181IqgS+hCIRaRekMxEn6SdteoldlN/PkGhT9w4moQbP7M2OfL0/CP4912wk3BIMzCCpWw1hRoaR9OGxnhCElq+UlTT4atnP+Phz0wkqj9NWZsromg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tMxAc-0007TZ-22 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 17:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73073] [PATCH v3 1/8] packages: Use origin file names as their input labels. Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73073 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch moreinfo To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Josselin Poiret , 73073@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Andreas Enge , Christopher Baines , Nicolas Goaziou , Janneke Nieuwenhuizen Received: via spool by 73073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73073.173430195228664 (code B ref 73073); Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 73073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2024 22:32:32 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=52518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tMx9r-0007Rb-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 17:32:30 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]:44515) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tMx9j-0007RU-Gm for 73073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 17:32:08 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6d91653e9d7so34364996d6.1 for <73073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 14:32:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1734301867; x=1734906667; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3eIuSrI6OOe8XVcTXYq5bY3UfSseo7XpN3AU8tZxA/s=; b=jbTux957z/J6l0n1PgjBISeqNMFdE3aoMZw2gCYE6cJ+CcAPzO0FRUDmeO2XsT9VxC Mp0Tia+qhE/H6vFnlirESPByCvwS5+VmP5fWG80X6ttHU3IlG6K1/pfx5vyv0tTO+B1m ubCRh8vf7/KrtULu4yUgEa1LejJQvOfqpaydYE2oRs4B5m74VUe6qNh5NRV9Kqp0laKG Jk0+5fxyct2GIEYZOVvhqen75n23psqT/6f2DyFOE0kdCFJww89yFpmBbWeVEo7C01mF CoieXODNNXKQ4u6Wmv2NOisBkJeS6IGuM9Koce8TgfoSUtSJkYXe0wh3HbQ3gqqYOmJ5 IVdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734301867; x=1734906667; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3eIuSrI6OOe8XVcTXYq5bY3UfSseo7XpN3AU8tZxA/s=; b=aAJ/K4fQXnRzGW/iUTPE8AlRBatSomExOneopd6CzGFAImzucMPZZ194UXoPJ/BCeI qGICXq16FS5QbrSMJq0dK3/aphRHeBcEvBzb5SGST9VRVwSodzVQxjHPqN/Z4ZGAzed2 2VXqooa6KqHh/eUOEgRllaCgrNGmNEld6dxVdYmHFUUCZwPAIHvaGNSdf38O7TUbVQgv HXuzn+LdthSmItZvBhvchnDMZlYOB6V/y8O5jpo3EDSTDeUn3rQQR9LonAvAwbQc7liF OiiKuGfGEOOlmak2MHl21xTkQCAYS2/W1qcuywL72Zdn8LZ/0mx9o+BApDu4UNx06fmO SOEA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXL50RJBfd9NV3Yt0EBEIUXuziUZFUlFJNT3D7JEsPN8u6/jDki2AShRqil4uu9Dmxt9QLwAw==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwElAN/SQt9Lnj2KJgAmRUiPBGm7g7rmp3dqbOU9jBQYMGEsA+A 7ZcgLAUAn5in0SCfDG0poXbBXC4zCNyEcltirW1Cb8PfVrqmSv42wbDA/Qrlt0CmTmXziK1U/dJ +RgPyit3463I4V560N1OBAdghnlk= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvwfqVcRj9acUau055SFuI/7lu84+pLLOUC6li8rDOpV+J4ZV7W/GO5wXO889p riWXY6mCtazUkqof9WevsieraArlwU9cM39J6Uw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9pZ8Wt/khfKF/NajqhXDlGRZA8ShlN8hj8+/arxPa+aEYJjqXJbkYvIsoubPMf3G6HDJY4e0pR5LNDMWZeMw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2682:b0:6d8:aa04:9a5d with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6dc8ca3e889mr169325076d6.4.1734301866830; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 14:31:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0d6eb889edc5675f9afff3efba15fa2058651874.1733334723.git.ludo@gnu.org> <87cyhz1w2z.fsf@gmail.com> <87pllxb12o.fsf@gnu.org> <87h674hasp.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87h674hasp.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Tournier Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 23:30:55 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b4b0b10629569e4e" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C94045CE34 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.97 X-Spam-Score: -8.97 X-TUID: mw9f2gmhzaig --000000000000b4b0b10629569e4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 at 22:54, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Regarding #2, what do we mean by =E2=80=9Cworld rebuild=E2=80=9D? 30K? 2= 0K? 10K? > I think the phrase is colloquially understood as =E2=80=9Ca lot of rebuil= ds=E2=80=9D, > usually meaning more than 5K per architecture. With this magnitude, > world rebuilds are now commonplace. > > The way to deal with such changes is documented and working relatively > well though (info "(guix) Managing Patches and Branches"). The key > insight from experience over the past years is that we must avoid scope > creep and instead have focused branches. This is somehow a waste of electrical resource. This discussion [1] is not done IMHO and we are seeing again another instance of what I tried to describe [1]. BTW, please note if we would like to follow what is described by "Managing Patches and Branches", the workflow would read: create a topic branch where the topic is "input- label", apply the whole fix (including the rebuild cycle), build it then merge. Somehow I'm missing a point with the argument... Whatever. :-) For sure, now is better than never, as a good Zen said. So I will live with this merge. Cheers, simon PS: Although never is often better than *right* now, said right after the very same good Zen. ;-) 1: Naming =E2=80=9Cbuild train=E2=80=9D instead of =E2=80=9Cmerge train=E2= =80=9D? Simon Tournier Mon, 09 Sep 2024 19:28:57 +0200 id:878qw0sply.fsf@gmail.com https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-09 https://yhetil.org/guix/878qw0sply.fsf@gmail.com --000000000000b4b0b10629569e4e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 at 22:54, Ludovic Court=C3= =A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Regarding #2, what do we mean by =E2=80=9Cworld rebuild=E2=80=9D? =C2= =A030K? 20K? 10K?
> I think the phrase is colloquially understood as = =E2=80=9Ca lot of rebuilds=E2=80=9D,
> usually meaning more than 5K p= er architecture.=C2=A0 With this magnitude,
> world rebuilds are now = commonplace.
>
> The way to deal with such changes is documente= d and working relatively
> well though (info "(guix) Managing Pa= tches and Branches").=C2=A0 The key
> insight from experience ov= er the past years is that we must avoid scope
> creep and instead hav= e focused branches.

This is somehow a waste of elect= rical resource.=C2=A0 This discussion [1] is not done IMHO and we are seein= g again another instance of what I tried to describe [1].
BTW, please note if we would like to follow what is described b= y=C2=A0 "Managing Patches and Branches", the workflow would read:= create a topic branch where the topic is "input- label", apply t= he whole fix (including the rebuild cycle), build it then merge.
<= div>
Somehow I'm missing a point with the argument...=C2= =A0 Whatever. :-)

For sure, now is better than nev= er, as a good Zen said.=C2=A0 So I will live with this merge.

Cheers,
simon

PS: Althou= gh never is often better than *right* now, said right after the very same g= ood Zen. ;-)

1: Naming =E2=80=9Cbuild train=E2= =80=9D instead of =E2=80=9Cmerge train=E2=80=9D?
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 19:28:57 +0200
id:878qw0sply.fsf@gmail.com
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix= -devel/2024-09
https://yhetil.org/guix/878qw0sply.fsf@gmail.com

=
--000000000000b4b0b10629569e4e--