From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ii3aZ-00031i-71 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:44:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ii3aU-0008Nl-Ex for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:44:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ii3aU-0008M1-67 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:44:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ii3aU-0004qt-3I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:44:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38678] [PATCH 2/2] size: Add '--load-path' option. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191219210958.8807-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <20191219211400.8978-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <87sglgq9rs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-Reply-To: <87sglgq9rs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: zimoun Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:43:23 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 38678@debbugs.gnu.org On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 22:35, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I haven't tested, but otherwise looks good to me! What do you think about the missing test? Could also comment the cover letter (guix refresh, guix edit, etc.)? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38678#5 > > diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi > > index 02f7cf5b39..c0fa6a3cab 100644 > > --- a/doc/guix.texi > > +++ b/doc/guix.texi > > @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ Copyright @copyright{} 2019 Jakob L. Kreuze@* > > Copyright @copyright{} 2019 Kyle Andrews@* > > Copyright @copyright{} 2019 Alex Griffin@* > > Copyright @copyright{} 2019 Guillaume Le Vaillant@* > > -Copyright @copyright{} 2019 Simon Tournier@* > > Did you remove the copyright line by mistake? Maybe. :-) Cheers, simon