From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57443)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1itZoR-0005Md-0U
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:22:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1itZoP-00034V-VQ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:22:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39890)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1itZoP-00034N-Rc
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:22:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1itZoP-0000Td-NB
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:22:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#38678] Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH -
 Reason?
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38678.B38678.15795373141821@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87pnglj2ka.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3X5DZ3DVDXY5_WHEOzL01=nJGkJeBHZxL-1eLS3x8c8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sglgsiey.fsf@lassieur.org> <878sn8inru.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87o8w4mewg.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0_5AB57FgNyagAA-KCOW=o7AgDrr4v5p8n4XvEmJH7=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lfr8fd9u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191226213108.753f8ab7@scratchpost.org>
 <CAJ3okZ2HSh_WbiWEz65-A_LZLgN91Dc-rAQe_7PbA09YQid64Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blr3eao0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3G5YteTpMJdsfUHHp=LrzZ593OrZAaupk=x7bp3CZ-3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87ftge13h5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0UpdL-u4mayy8iLtaKK72VSHd2YkTu1FY8NYj6Pi=4AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87y2u6yqat.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3xqX=E8=i9Yhw01HYzx5Ry8irLOT2z=j2ryonnoL=h4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87d0bhkm6l.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <87d0bhkm6l.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:21:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ1V0-jnDW7S9Ay6=pM0YG-s==-Pec1=Ffe4JSucGaEHNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 38678@debbugs.gnu.org

On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 13:01, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:

> > Why are you the author of ee9a735bc8 [1]?
>
> Good question :(  My apologies, it seems that when I resolve the
> conflict your authorship was lost in the process.  Sorry about that.

You owe me a beer at Guix Days 1. ;-)


> > Why there are lines modified in guix.texi 21f4fbdd84 [2] which are not
> > in the original patch [3]?
>
> Hmmm... Looks like Emacs' ws-buttler had a hickup here.  I don't know
> why, sorry about that.

Well, you owe me a beer at Guix Days 2. ;-)


Yes, extra spaces had been introduced by these commits:
21531add320
83db0205060
The good point is now, it is fixed. ;-)


What I do not understand is: why 'ws-buttler' had a hiccup? Did you
modify my patch? I mean ws-buttler generally works by hooking
(before-save-hook), therefore to have a hiccup, 'ws-buttler' needed a
modification then a save, right? Why?


Thank you for reviewing and pushing.
I will remind that you owe me 2 belgian beers. ;-)


Cheers,
simon