From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uHQbA1+Da18/LgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:23 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id OFaWOl6Da1+QFAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B9B9402AD for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kL8PL-00057R-Tb for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:18:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kL8P4-00055D-EO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:18:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kL8P4-0008TY-2S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kL8P3-0003Sa-Tn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43578] [PATCH 0/4] Rewriting implicit inputs with 'package-input-rewriting' & co. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43578 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 43578@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43578-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43578.160088147213277 (code B ref 43578); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:01 +0000 Received: (at 43578) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2020 17:17:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37706 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kL8Ou-0003S5-9x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:17:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:36109) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kL8Or-0003Rl-UK for 43578@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:17:50 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id n10so542492qtv.3 for <43578@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8OnZQLQdGGtc2dzQLLkrNkViI7xs0ZoaunFDMcIeeAw=; b=R+Y62V4BMJZHpuJM2Kw/Vo1ZircbREnQpnY+tsV64WaHkuOaSv8ys7i75ORAedC3KU CwUkqQ1VDrFLa9BQfsAt3ND6DckcIF4UWOghwSt+EqkU5PUU9VMQhm1QlbhTM8r3GvdO VXDFEBtz1ZufTEO1x+4OJ1+78j+TLJnA1naxcLjYQi4gDyqQE8Fl3IzvXNpiRN3nk5+A 16DR6k48SqXU+KVDWoos7S/OPVPOBPGbabUT85UpB5EeV+6indmav6wX7HCU+tmO0Os9 b7k7xseNZNciAafcjj2NTzoaHgMtKog+jUumEnSjTeFgpRJTwgXaxZkKES8u3xpdaHKE yDSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8OnZQLQdGGtc2dzQLLkrNkViI7xs0ZoaunFDMcIeeAw=; b=YQ8HkbnY6F4eykyUfhyjfDdjYkmj8wWT3orVv5bFCVUfRFdCdUxATQdSOUPW50oE7f DJKa7kfYvPag/UmPEx5mfni0R4/MP2o0RrP3ZZk/sJGpm/ckwszzbd5Cp6uZcnaxeqYM W+ydMNVe2o80yGTjEGcChsuLXD0JwS/YoTojneMtbA2kYrBdUhbfZ5p8NCGegkWE5PPF 3CRlBR54N96pX8KoK6DiR8Y1EV7kjxQXWA4isncszImBSl2u8m+iG7wX24yw5BDOZMxq JHfB4hmIcYhUv8g42pRd1sc9dIqER/J+tMqiO+H4hyg3Vr1hgLHQkw8f/1zbIh9P1LlN csFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Op1r1OZuTkdKxV7rB+6XApMoRmMqzFjq79369UPNErRXH6z/v LXcd9ZsPZs3xZRfm9XEmyASWeDmWCSfgKD+J9sY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFC9Xx0kDsAPyX8eetKNDp9IFxU/2CcLh3lz+/X7cQduo1+KZkxLC4lpjTmYIPbbr07Tm476OF/6p5D4+fB2w= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:fec:: with SMTP id f41mr1166117qtk.186.1600881464396; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:17:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200923161253.2378-1-ludo@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <20200923161253.2378-1-ludo@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:17:33 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=R+Y62V4B; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: wb0MOmMUwbYp Hi, On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 18:23, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Concretely, the following commands had no effect thus far: > > guix build python-itsdangerous --with-input=3Dpython=3Dpython2 > guix build hello --with-input=3Dgcc=3Dgcc-toolchain@10 > > In both cases, this is because the input we want to change is > an implicit input. This patch set fixes that, and it fixes > as a side effect. Awesome! Therefore, 'package-with-explicit-python' & co. are becoming obsolete (or almost), right? > This opens new possibilities. =E2=80=98--with-input=3Dpython=3Dpython2= =E2=80=99 is one > of them, but =E2=80=98--with-input=3Dgcc=3Dgcc-toolchain@10=E2=80=99 is n= ot (it fails > to build for obscure reasons that I=E2=80=99ll fix in =E2=80=98core-updat= es=E2=80=99, and > it rebuilds the world anyway, which is not practical). Another Rebuilding the world, maybe. :-) It is interesting in the HPC context where one would like use an "optimized" compiler, isn't? Thank you. I will give it a try for my use cases. :-) All the best, simon