From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mBrsH4tL91/vEAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:57:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 6L22G4tL918iYAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:57:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F279402A0 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 17:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZXO-0004sl-48 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:57:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZX1-0004rw-Ls for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:57:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZWx-0002dt-14 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:57:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZWw-0003j6-Vx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45632] [PATCH] guix package: Warn if uses has 'guix' package in profile. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45632 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: me@tobias.gr, 45632@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= , 45632@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 45632-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45632.161004221414297 (code B ref 45632); Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 45632) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2021 17:56:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48613 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZWo-0003iX-1m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:56:54 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]:44277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZWn-0003i4-0M for 45632@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:56:53 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f43.google.com with SMTP id d11so3114108qvo.11 for <45632@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:56:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rUN7IDcJgi+kLNPFKHhMW01OF6j6yl1jnLxJBJOifv8=; b=Gq9Qz8Wzerv/f9tjxpxwJtAE+7zkOXdu4bqfY9raQPHIefm0pyGxRs6qZ61cMTf/fX tltZ79AgORlLxDxVKARpO55yrSLstJVngWzBhlCuuwxhQOPRhvTqQWieg8KVbjgECpcf DioMBfNB0G3QcbBk/+lIIyQGfr7U2hXdOPKwyPN8B0duVkOnOP5f8jWDx1/TonLcg0Rl /gKmzqsEX7/AqcO5olCua3dz5LCN9s5FEQ0YG9H56Htn3z/MuKFXkzoEnvtKaTwl+RuZ u2BbqE53jGYS2xHK0bdX3+R+S77avRZLJ9wr5qDUhkjg/ieb8rarC4DlWZr2eWc5LEk0 rc/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rUN7IDcJgi+kLNPFKHhMW01OF6j6yl1jnLxJBJOifv8=; b=fgcGP5bYdmnqMlN/kmfP7N+mc4IVVCsxBoEdhz/TpiBugZYfL7xaDyWIcVgtsVmiGQ LWBHw1y8lamp3ra+6bkXdNFqlSn5NtGdWoJPHfQfsxK64uCKS1ccUcvDbOKessej5JAS O4rzfOld03SaepPsBCJcX1rG9oqidI3sjUeKRXHPzLQfrpQ8bGo+ZeG7gFa5cFNeQxeR YImL6aBsNGN+BqtT36oRtfxGi6+Wiarb8I9gxjZT051IWqW+EPxxaXdW8CUV+in42YGM ny75K7zJl9rZikzoPWBJ5b2hT2lXf7FUaraw8Nt6BnhJp9U7ufq8Q7C/75QukhYDd5Ba F5fA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mlxkWJ7XR+hJCj5nj+zsRtg5D7ha3w9ai4zqEjB6HPSkHtFLp wWtZUQYsd/bXoQJMUnyqJir9/nkjMkfaFliW7nU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+GLrfekbO/PBBsLg5vsk2U9w9U0Y8jkLDj0jJORaR6Kw827xEfz1cDLN3vATYo9+7fDN5O2C9tCjgBFZX/X4= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:df94:: with SMTP id w20mr9650093qvl.33.1610042207363; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:56:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210103183202.11224-1-kuba@kadziolka.net> <87eeiwllbn.fsf@nckx> In-Reply-To: <87eeiwllbn.fsf@nckx> From: zimoun Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:56:36 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kuba@kadziolka.net Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.25 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Gq9Qz8Wz; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 40F279402A0 X-Spam-Score: -1.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: wVXzd9S9hiED Hi Tobias, On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 18:23, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via wrote: > How about warning on pull instead? That should address the =E2=80=98halp= , > me Guix be Benjamin Buttonin'=E2=80=99 support calls that I assume > inspired this. Wait, does someone install packages in the profile "~/.config/guix/current"? And does they install the package 'guix' in this profile? Nan... > Simon, would that reduce the noise in your case? I am not sure to understand what the problem is; I should miss something. My config is simply '~/.config/guix/current/bin' first in my PATH and I am doing it manually with ~/.bash_profile. And I have a lot of profiles that are sourced with a for-loop, some of them contain the package 'guix'. And I have never hit an issue but I do not use 'upgrade'. Howver, I am mainly using Guix on Debian. Is the issue Guix System specific? Well, if the conflict is between the package 'guix' and the 'upgrade' command, then the warning should be there, IMHO. All the best, simon