> Would you like to look into that? Sure, I'll see if I can track down the issue. On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 08:50, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Michael Ford writes: > > Hi! > > > From c8e8b7dacfe86147226a687acd495e59826368d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: fanquake > > Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 14:42:38 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: mingw: Update reproducibility patch. > > * gnu/packages/patches/mingw-w64-reproducible-gendef.patch: Update from > > upstream. > > --- > > .../patches/mingw-w64-reproducible-gendef.patch | 16 +++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Applied, thanks! > > However...even with this patch MinGW does not build reproducibly, e.g. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > diffoscope > /gnu/store/ra40ckd09sapzlh7mib2qmwkbjamgcxb-mingw-w64-x86_64-11.0.1/lib/libntoc.a > /tmp/ra40ckd09sapzlh7mib2qmwkbjamgcxb-mingw-w64-x86_64-11.0.1/lib/libntoc.a > --- > /gnu/store/ra40ckd09sapzlh7mib2qmwkbjamgcxb-mingw-w64-x86_64-11.0.1/lib/libntoc.a > +++ > /tmp/ra40ckd09sapzlh7mib2qmwkbjamgcxb-mingw-w64-x86_64-11.0.1/lib/libntoc.a > ├── file list > │ @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > │ ----------- 0 0 0 100 2023-08-18 13:26:59.000000 / > │ --rw-r--r-- 0 999 30000 586 2023-08-18 13:26:59.000000 > libntoct.o > │ --rw-r--r-- 0 999 30000 648 2023-08-18 13:26:59.000000 > libntoch.o > │ --rw-r--r-- 0 999 30000 624 2023-08-18 13:26:59.000000 > libntocs00000.o > │ +---------- 0 0 0 100 2023-08-19 06:04:15.000000 / > │ +-rw-r--r-- 0 999 30000 586 2023-08-19 06:04:15.000000 > libntoct.o > │ +-rw-r--r-- 0 999 30000 648 2023-08-19 06:04:15.000000 > libntoch.o > │ +-rw-r--r-- 0 999 30000 624 2023-08-19 06:04:15.000000 > libntocs00000.o > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Would you like to look into that? > > Greetings, > Janneke > > -- > Janneke Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond > https://LilyPond.org > Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® > https://AvatarAcademy.com >