Sorry, one more thing I missed in the documentation was the waiting period. The commit message missing is probably a misconfiguration. I can change to gcc-9, I just defaulted to the newest since the default was too old. That description is a verbatim copy of their description. I'll fix these up, then issue another patch series. On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 8:06 AM Leo Prikler wrote: > Hello Anadon, > > I have not yet built your package (because I'm currently also handling > another patch), but since you've requested review over at guix-devel, > I'll have a go at it. > For the future please note, that a delay of 2 days does not mean we > haven't noticed you at all. The manual has the following to say for > committers: > > For anything else, please post to and leave > > time for a review, without committing anything (*note Submitting > > Patches::). If you didn’t receive any reply after two weeks, and if > > you’re confident, it’s OK to commit. > > Am Freitag, den 01.01.2021, 19:51 -0500 schrieb Anadon: > > From: Josh Marshall > Ehh, somehow the commit message and everything is missing here. Is > that intended or just misconfigured? > > > --- > > gnu/packages/cpp.scm | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm > > index 00e006928e..ff10a4247b 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/cpp.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/cpp.scm > > @@ -807,3 +807,27 @@ code will be mixed in with the actual > > programming logic. This implementation > > provides a number of utilities to make coding with expected > > cleaner.") > > (home-page "https://tl.tartanllama.xyz/") > > (license license:cc0))) > > + > > +(define-public magic-enum > > + (package > > + (name "magic-enum") > > + (version "0.7.2") > > + (home-page "https://github.com/Neargye/magic_enum") > > + (source (origin > > + (method git-fetch) > > + (uri (git-reference > > + (url home-page) > > + (commit (string-append "v" version)))) > > + (sha256 > > + (base32 > > + "0fmkyh1srkz2bx68agfa30sankg1ig1f95xqp8sp9wj3p9qil > > sv2")) > > + (modules '((guix build utils))))) > > + (build-system cmake-build-system) > > + > > + (inputs > > + `(("gcc" ,gcc-10))) > The home-page claims, that it works with GCC>=9. Have you encountered > any issues with gcc-9 instead? > > + (synopsis "Header-only C++17 library for reflection for > > enums") > I feel as though that could be worded better. > > + (description "Static reflection for enums (to string, from > > string, > > +iteration) for modern C++, work with any enum type without any macro > > or > > +boilerplate code") > Descriptions should be complete sentences and end with a period. > > + (license license:expat))) > > Regards, > Leo > >