From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56098)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jEwcV-00008e-21
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jEwcT-0004gR-Vc
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37509)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jEwcT-0004gN-Se
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jEwcT-0000ai-Qg
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40105] [PATCH] gnu: Add wol.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40105.B.15846298802265@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56068)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1jEwcP-00008V-3F
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:57:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1jEwcO-0004dQ-4h
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:57:57 -0400
Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]:46969)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>)
 id 1jEwcN-0004d8-Uh
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:57:56 -0400
Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id v3so2502983iom.13
 for <guix-patches@gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEwRq=qY8Qgz97Y_ivHb6qrUPieD95Jw-AUqoFnwOMUQ56sVUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200319125527.diyj7squla4jfhv2@gravity>
In-Reply-To: <20200319125527.diyj7squla4jfhv2@gravity>
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:57:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEwRq=rtcoaKA5PYNyiZrMKdLhOGc3SWUwCjKWvD-oo=sQqqWg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= <kuba@kadziolka.net>
Cc: 40105@debbugs.gnu.org

hello,

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka <kuba@kadziolka.n=
et> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:04:51PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> > I don't know if having multiple packages doing the same is OK or not.
> > Nor do I know if there are differences between this "wol" and the
> > already packaged "wakelan"...
>
> I don't think having multiple packages for doing something is
> necessarily bad.

Yep, me too, but I think I'll refrain from doing the other WoL packages...

> > +    (description "Tool to send a @code{magic} packet to wake another h=
ost
> > +on the network.  This must be enabled on the target host, usually in t=
he
> > +BIOS.")
>
> If I may ask, what's the rationale behind putting "magic" in a @code tag
> here?

I think I copied that desc from somewhere else (maybe nixos) and it had quo=
ting
around, and then guix lint told me to use @code instead, I probably should =
just
have removed the quotes... Nothing more than that, you can remove them if
you want to commit, or if you want I can resubmit without...

--=20
Vincent Legoll