From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jEwcV-00008e-21 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jEwcT-0004gR-Vc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jEwcT-0004gN-Se for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jEwcT-0000ai-Qg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:58:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#40105] [PATCH] gnu: Add wol. Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40105.B.15846298802265@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1jEwcP-00008V-3F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:57:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1jEwcO-0004dQ-4h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:57:57 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]:46969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1jEwcN-0004d8-Uh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:57:56 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id v3so2502983iom.13 for <guix-patches@gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:57:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAEwRq=qY8Qgz97Y_ivHb6qrUPieD95Jw-AUqoFnwOMUQ56sVUw@mail.gmail.com> <20200319125527.diyj7squla4jfhv2@gravity> In-Reply-To: <20200319125527.diyj7squla4jfhv2@gravity> From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:57:42 +0100 Message-ID: <CAEwRq=rtcoaKA5PYNyiZrMKdLhOGc3SWUwCjKWvD-oo=sQqqWg@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org> To: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= <kuba@kadziolka.net> Cc: 40105@debbugs.gnu.org hello, On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka <kuba@kadziolka.n= et> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:04:51PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote: > > I don't know if having multiple packages doing the same is OK or not. > > Nor do I know if there are differences between this "wol" and the > > already packaged "wakelan"... > > I don't think having multiple packages for doing something is > necessarily bad. Yep, me too, but I think I'll refrain from doing the other WoL packages... > > + (description "Tool to send a @code{magic} packet to wake another h= ost > > +on the network. This must be enabled on the target host, usually in t= he > > +BIOS.") > > If I may ask, what's the rationale behind putting "magic" in a @code tag > here? I think I copied that desc from somewhere else (maybe nixos) and it had quo= ting around, and then guix lint told me to use @code instead, I probably should = just have removed the quotes... Nothing more than that, you can remove them if you want to commit, or if you want I can resubmit without... --=20 Vincent Legoll