From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlFE-0006uu-WD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:02:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlFC-0001GM-R5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:02:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlFC-0001G2-Jn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:02:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlFC-0006XD-Fj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:02:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40391] [PATCH 0/6] Make some more inputs native. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <877dyvv80v.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <877dyvv80v.fsf@gmail.com> From: Vincent Legoll Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:01:40 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 40391@debbugs.gnu.org On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:51 PM Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > - ibus is just over 300 > > - gdb is ~1.4K > > Pushed those two on staging and the other ones on master. Thanks for > this serie, feel to propose new ones, if you feel like it :) Thanks I'll see what I can do... ;-) BTW, do we want to annotate (maybe with a simple comment) the ones found to really be used ? -- Vincent Legoll