From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id hRIAEJYHIWYEPwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:44:22 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id hRIAEJYHIWYEPwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:44:22 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="eCpmqAO/"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1713440662; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=g+GZ8qlnbjyDHIrJ4YiYDwu3rpIOZVWsshxHqHQ8wXQ=; b=atyY3qYyGIuM57ASt0CQJTkVSnD1ZTHcu3PsI682y6kEo/D9zqhMi6fkYLAgNmSLNdQfPd oQz1QiKqlm9MoMJTPy+CDE54jMkyBXJlg8YsM9Y0g9oMyYERCeTMocDsEivUb/p0R2tf/0 mxehnjhG1u5On+bGgLgWuxjvS0H+xbtYr2f6SDic89FSjmr7PJzzqTMCtJaOOjXrwj3ZhR w/hD7lgTBoYEPE06fFONO+rOgoTUt7YrEPAG2GflSgbvW3zxPkwbIqp2hQ7MEVxi/iGCjx FV/Q+OTlaHpeEUXDm6gxsOa3/GnireeuLyT66oJMYS4/rAM3fMWnm3sOs0YOng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="eCpmqAO/"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1713440662; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ITcJPmgdii59qiktIxXjVNpGtYN7PEoR3LJ9dwZYJHGI4yLp/enLOCQgjH9D5+o2YLH/sn i1vlTqSSgTWPJ29yRxcdDTa/BUnXEYBS0CsVkfS9PmtNwnzebTJP/F/ubvJSaOC6RdQ3qf pUQgoOrUQzdbwcoawu6Qi9cBQZry32Fs471KlbGpp3TW60p+IGZVDV17PIoy/1o3E3xrL7 kL17BgZvdoaWa4G4qXa7mSWOzIyNeOWnIKrp2ZkmfWvY7OkeboKke9GTHUyGFJYn5c5wPr LbjHW+hSJ4U4rBjolTj4izLPzQ174zMhcVvO6TEom+0W0RWpfQ5dTA65J8QqMg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC8D65289 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:44:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxQBT-0000Xx-Tr; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:44:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxQBP-0000Vx-I7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:44:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxQBN-000502-Il for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxQBa-00024N-HX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:44:14 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#70353] [PATCH] pull: Add fine-grained control for `guix pull --allow-downgrades`. Resent-From: Rostislav Svoboda Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:44:13 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70353 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: dev@jpoiret.xyz, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, othacehe@gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, me@tobias.gr, rekado@elephly.net, 70353@debbugs.gnu.org, guix@cbaines.net Received: via spool by 70353-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70353.17134406357627 (code B ref 70353); Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:44:13 +0000 Received: (at 70353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2024 11:43:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51933 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxQB9-0001xe-ND for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:43:53 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]:55581) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxQB1-0001uX-Ne for 70353@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:43:44 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4375ddb9eaeso4329011cf.3 for <70353@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 04:43:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713440600; x=1714045400; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g+GZ8qlnbjyDHIrJ4YiYDwu3rpIOZVWsshxHqHQ8wXQ=; b=eCpmqAO/b8kvztJGiaxF7SSzLTHtynfd34Ep6nL0dyf9SnQ047i2s0Yr5tSz0iVmmn mXjSat48y3HnM1eAJBjMKNnkdlz4G49eB7B54LCD/y6LZUSiwWMNlry5tnC4o0t0qWo+ Ag6WY7+eiptySC3ORUA7BQhNwwBBf7RNVCdxYUUNwcZyUAzjTzzc2rJXqhjeh5fpoqdx pE+6LzGZ1bnpll3Nq3DWRhaAk4+WtFec9r0F2+pwWkdEgpiWJlVaYVGbGsGsG+UvL/sL GD8Gl+GI4S/w96yc1o6oaz3gqyLsIbtZvyiBHZTHFDr8J+kpHaX6R+duIwl9fZZByScG +CDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713440600; x=1714045400; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=g+GZ8qlnbjyDHIrJ4YiYDwu3rpIOZVWsshxHqHQ8wXQ=; b=o5hsRUeeLOJQvlpz8FIaXKm0qov78Rm+8hk3oRKQs9eIhm8lU64Vm0sOS9+ocfcywb 3YVgK1dHs7H/StOXCjdeMgDKhqc0rhg3Ksy4pEa1jjY6mFIi9Tx8uibQjE0tmxPn1j6g CMvBcD2XzYtQ/Ie04JVNyBT8vrLMVZaM7q2vZ9BTPFazLunelfkDctfpLkptKaynAmxe TnMC1ZmDvbAUwqWoYNd4BT+zuzRcFZGmizH7Vh1WWNCX/Uqfkoffm7t2Nxk+wvazZsov gP9yQcQTTDwedSp8GgXPiiUsdUBslEhXM8V3p2c2ggRNfSXt57AztlKRIQ3RAJ1pULTY N/TA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyNLYgZzFR3OjJgdK0DVcC57QBdwTpzzn+uO0eeBFkcVWSImPuD Lw2LrrPPetLp6dyJEuOKIA+bW/blriGJxOpjvncqQYp1Pl65gp3sdSc5aGnboDdlQ0ukEMH6cMy 5AWPvgCRJaknIaObEE8hDk6IJQ78= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFl6JgJVpXwjL+a2eMLmMd2JnG4AllVZn3s3j3Fl0/9rOfJWsIYJX3fsDPwVanjIBw6uylPBwN88jtzJwbd3h8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1354:b0:437:84a8:afd3 with SMTP id w20-20020a05622a135400b0043784a8afd3mr3303469qtk.25.1713440600555; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 04:43:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3dbbb59fdc650a20a0eb853a0d30aaccae1beae5.1712927299.git.Rostislav.Svoboda@gmail.com> <87sezl90yc.fsf@pelzflorian.de> In-Reply-To: <87sezl90yc.fsf@pelzflorian.de> From: Rostislav Svoboda Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:42:44 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.52 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -3.52 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0AC8D65289 X-TUID: d6SK44BHtn7K Hello Florian, > I have run > > ./pre-inst-env etc/teams.scm cc-members \ > 0002-pull-Add-fine-grained-control-for-guix-pull-allow-do.patch > > which fails, so I run format-patch again and it no longer fails Ah. Thank you. > putting procedures in cons cells [... or ...] better use symbols I asked ChatGPT4 about it. It thinks it's fine ;-) It claims (as I expected) "When you place a procedure in a cons cell, you are not copying the procedure itself into the cell. Instead, you store a reference (or pointer) to the procedure." and "security implications are more about the integrity and trustworthiness of the procedures themselves" So yeah, good job from me, right? :-) Cheers Bost