From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIpnD-0003ko-GS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 02:20:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIpn8-0006Mn-Vy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 02:20:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIpn8-0006Md-RU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 02:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIpn8-0005re-FO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 02:20:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31464] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-orgalist: Fix texinfo markup in description. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180515221621.436ca448@centurylink.net> References: <20180515200315.8491-1-boskovits@gmail.com> <87603owuae.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87wow4vdu8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20180515221621.436ca448@centurylink.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 08:18:58 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b76c2b056c4cb10e" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Eric Bavier Cc: 31464@debbugs.gnu.org --000000000000b76c2b056c4cb10e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2018-05-16 5:16 GMT+02:00 Eric Bavier : > On Tue, 15 May 2018 22:55:11 +0200 > Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > > > > > This markup breaks guix package -s on current master. > > > And guix lint also says, that there is invalid markup in the > description. > > > You might mean @dfn{LaTeX}, though. > > > > Yet, @LaTeX{} is valid Texinfo code. > > Yes, but guile's (texinfo) module does not understand the entire set of > texinfo commands. I'm not sure whether the subset it does understand > is even clearly documented. > > I guess that we can contribute the @LaTeX{} macro to the guile module, at least a simplified version for sure, but I don't think it will make before core-updates next. In my opinion this fix is an acceptable tradeoff. We might add a comment to modify the markup, once support lands in guile, if it is deemed necessary. WDYT? > Best thing to do is listen to 'guix lint' and fix any "invalid" markup. > > `~Eric > --000000000000b76c2b056c4cb10e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2018= -05-16 5:16 GMT+02:00 Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net= >:
On Tue, 15 May 2018 22:55:11 +0200
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasg= oaziou.fr> wrote:

> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskov= its@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > This markup breaks guix package -s on current master.
> > And guix lint also says, that there is invalid markup in the desc= ription.
> > You might mean @dfn{LaTeX}, though.=C2=A0
>
> Yet, @LaTeX{} is valid Texinfo code.

Yes, but guile's (texinfo) module does not understand the e= ntire set of
texinfo commands.=C2=A0 I'm not sure whether the subset it does underst= and
is even clearly documented.


I guess that we can contribute the @La= TeX{} macro to the guile module,=C2=A0
at least a simplified vers= ion for sure, but I don't think it will make before
core-upda= tes next. In my opinion this fix is an acceptable tradeoff.
We mi= ght add a comment to modify the markup, once support lands
in gui= le, if it is deemed necessary. WDYT?=C2=A0
=C2=A0
Best thing to do is listen to 'guix lint' and fix any "invalid= " markup.

`~Eric

--000000000000b76c2b056c4cb10e--