From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYqhT-000655-Bg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 05:00:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYqhP-0006px-D6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 05:00:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYqhP-0006pY-95 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 05:00:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYqhO-0001cO-Qw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 05:00:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29891] [PATCH] gnu: java-classpathx-servletapi: Update to 3.0-r1244. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d12jh4td.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20171229134104.6951-1-boskovits@gmail.com> <20180107221142.17118-1-boskovits@gmail.com> <87d12jh4td.fsf@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 10:59:40 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144425a2c737f056254f900" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Chris Marusich Cc: 29891@debbugs.gnu.org --001a1144425a2c737f056254f900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Actually, I don't know. I've not asked for that. This is the only commit since years. Maybe they are willing to make a new release. I will ask them, and cc you. 2018-01-09 8:25 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich : > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > > > * gnu/packages/java.scm (java-classpathx-servletapi): Update to > 3.0-r1244. > > This seems correct to me. I also verified that this builds > reproducibly. > > The commit message is a bit long; we could summarize it with a sentence > instead. > > How difficult would it be to have upstream make a new release? It looks > like we're now using an arbitrary revision of their source code, instead > of a release. In general, I think it's better to use a release if we > can, since that implies the code has been more thoroughly tested etc. > > -- > Chris > --001a1144425a2c737f056254f900 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Actually, I don't know. I've not asked for that. T= his is the only commit since years. Maybe they are willing to make a new re= lease.
I will ask them, and cc you.

2018-01-09 8:25 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich = <cmmarusich@gmail.com>:
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> writes:

> * gnu/packages/java.scm (java-classpathx-servletapi): Update to 3.0-r1= 244.

This seems correct to me.=C2=A0 I also verified that this builds
reproducibly.

The commit message is a bit long; we could summarize it with a sentence
instead.

How difficult would it be to have upstream make a new release?=C2=A0 It loo= ks
like we're now using an arbitrary revision of their source code, instea= d
of a release.=C2=A0 In general, I think it's better to use a release if= we
can, since that implies the code has been more thoroughly tested etc.

--
Chris

--001a1144425a2c737f056254f900--