From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ihwSG-0001Iy-0H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:07:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ihwSE-0004xc-Rd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:07:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ihwSE-0004wH-LL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:07:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ihwSE-00087x-GS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:07:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38662] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-next. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191218200419.28836-1-bandali@gnu.org> <877e2tz8z5.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: From: Valentin Ignatev Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:08:19 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cfc75059a0f0f57" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 38662@debbugs.gnu.org --0000000000006cfc75059a0f0f57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" As Leo pointed out on IRC, my patch would break guix package -u emacs-next because of hardcoded version. So it's better to fix the search patch instead of applying it. --0000000000006cfc75059a0f0f57 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
As Leo pointed out on IRC, my patch would break guix package -u emacs-next because of hardcoded version. So it's better to fix the search patch instead of applying it.
--0000000000006cfc75059a0f0f57--