From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50851)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hnoNP-0003Db-9J
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:10:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hnoNO-0005Oa-EB
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:10:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44137)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hnoNO-0005OO-An
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:10:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hnoNO-0003Gw-44
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:10:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#36562] downgrading ghc-ansi-terminal
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36562.B36562.156338697312538@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <92ADF111-C58E-45B6-B20A-A98EE61838FA@vllmrt.net>
 <87h87ksp60.fsf@ngyro.com>
In-Reply-To: <87h87ksp60.fsf@ngyro.com>
From: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:09:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CACy6W0A=na52vDh6eSf-YGrXCmhkKSumgaobLoTN76WZ9T2fVA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com>
Cc: Robert Vollmert <rob@vllmrt.net>, 36562@debbugs.gnu.org

> I=E2=80=99ve CC=E2=80=99ed Jacob on this message since they may not be su=
bscribed to the
> list.

That is indeed the case.

>> @Jacob: Would ghc-validation version 1 be sufficient for you
>> purposes?

Glancing at the changelog, it should be. If not, I'll use a custom
package definition. My use-case is low severity anyway.

Best,

Jacob.