From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id uJuODo9DcmeuFwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 06:54:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id uJuODo9DcmeuFwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 07:54:07 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=Mr09kAWA; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=NJZmFYfF; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1735541647; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=R7MI+n6Lr3XKVvmA4gWP2l0I68L23p/wkUtKExqwX6g=; b=XKJBNI3ggSBHNBc9wV2yGanNqbQbeoW7a4B/eyYPFLDvJWliSGfVQs5+BWGAL817VI6oDW U+kvrt9k49ryWQ94vFIk9AKvFVYYPSkj0A38sgTX+Azq70SB5TvXmjEd3gFzn8TNygWwej y1FpWrcTTCBbogy5ah+vF+ePIUCECj6JaA3yOxGpLecRJ763XxcLsK/0Wr/ow+lw6OF2MN P00yQPVSke35q55ZHK99nJQuC+NFMr9jKqWkMzAliE4mMXImdKGsiYv2pIBNeBtFRQMkdk rBQamv/jMdM9PhT0MQqv02tadRRPNjhD2JPPaGJjtyvTOxn6St1cGkvaTbkDsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=Mr09kAWA; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=NJZmFYfF; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1735541647; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=F5RLEhypZVHk9lhVN/OzhJuiVFcWSqAPGtefNAlY9h48PUK7dhBWGHhXjj81aPQB8g8xLF KfMLPELjHC90Lw/c3Y9J1fSn2e44HtVx2nMVM6PhWcZHE1Mhz/k3NYiaEQXO0UiBZFv+xi jmW9OrlzmKNImnLTahbl0g1XQi4/HlC5KZWlg72ONmq+IvLiShgF5eB7wqZFb9dkEe0OEf 1Z5srozERIqwzDhkoDu9PTS4z/0nW3YzLNcvJdyg9SQJFtk8D3c0HrVdwLYHcP0WRHgLe3 vsaB/y9qJXPhTV4HhN1gREqPlYcLzflxHKuLLCIAbz59hoTU6bN4q3Gk8T0VHg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA481C666 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 07:54:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tS9f9-0003qm-SS; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:54:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tS9f8-0003qe-I9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:54:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tS9f8-0002H8-A5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:54:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:To:Subject; bh=R7MI+n6Lr3XKVvmA4gWP2l0I68L23p/wkUtKExqwX6g=; b=Mr09kAWAdzZi5CzzX/mDi27NV3LpLo2YS2dAB92BadAmdAdX8pAuzrvrb7QUZ8+xLNzPyShwVPy7Dj/Fm00Q14cUZmxHSmOYjNVeV+3DFTu3ed02qfD7inLbi7H7ky0ypAOob6yRFCtfv3ZuiyAty0SumIpOW9+lp9UTP+r313Rvu/ktvEidInsiwe6uWvljQupWr7eCXIDOdra93hQW3cOOjvfNoQeAtgwVKih58U0lpSiNakqSMAtMVj+6OmbquAjO7n3e3d4knan/SoYO3mdyZGjsrLqLcuoE4SRESx8rH321dC97p67WifjdAfkasVKffiAcFGxrv2I/1wGoEw==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS9f8-0006sT-4T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#75146] [PATCH v0 00/15] XFCE: Move source from generated archive to git. Resent-From: Ashvith Shetty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 06:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75146 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= Cc: 75146@debbugs.gnu.org, Ashvith Shetty Received: via spool by 75146-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75146.173554159526331 (code B ref 75146); Mon, 30 Dec 2024 06:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 75146) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2024 06:53:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57119 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS9eM-0006qb-5t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:53:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:54642) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS9eH-0006qM-MX for 75146@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:53:12 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4361815b96cso57689885e9.1 for <75146@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 22:53:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1735541529; x=1736146329; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R7MI+n6Lr3XKVvmA4gWP2l0I68L23p/wkUtKExqwX6g=; b=NJZmFYfFMdaAraNjjG6cYn21yOukzxG+2S3LMLk+ozRBDpE9YOkb9H1U2A2Az4dZj4 ODpPfxG8UxMd3Ie2fBO0HTa5nqSv8ahAVTzhFFh7N0swlkI6px5Z1xLLYhBHeqLTeUio ZZrdimk1tXtWkr1NtedeGjEBr+fFy4ctCrKFsMNz6oUO4f5/S1upUskVlNZcNKzThOi2 dEv7JShrhU7wfxcNtN3xF4y3Ciim1kOi6y9g5PD4NZTxtquYvTRSEM7uFdtZXgKBUaJe nyoYPEb4oD/K5HJ9xaxiO4HQJZOFgDLuHsmBVKm6JQqHyEGBiQqh2XoL1tSgOHNaYWyM ZCEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1735541529; x=1736146329; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=R7MI+n6Lr3XKVvmA4gWP2l0I68L23p/wkUtKExqwX6g=; b=G6tTlwfJWGK9FV4UVg1JgO14ckOlYEYAUAzPZPZceskPYiDTEfSjdAWA9ncX6g3VfW yuKuJE/cuE/IlH+kt4YKTUuT7lwy81RDcpfh5QgmpStmu8wOfLf48orNH4VjDDIbzpFC FUQKO/OBXw17JcRcPRBmU6urLgS5erLTi9ALH32bIhsQYdt8XfTmmY0Hbs5fmc4Q6IDP ELv0Z6VwzHgFINYngJHKRPxsCYcb6FHODES+sq7oas0bGwzNEpbs8wwcw+XnVOI5HbaV HM/fSuj03Pj+1KVYz/CbEfC0eER1HZTJTkmFgZdqzbBmhzRMwz7MaNKLEfvV2evrD5I/ iUzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx1hHRtuH4eXgFQkyLQIq1004jyLL3t0LcnAyjg2KyNTi/atQBA ROEUNc8nO/XUdTCZe4uuVWToH+3QQbLP3D1/MriJ6GbIvAYu0h9uqW5k/jVMOtxoMxbBv54Lh3s x4BR999vvvYqB5MaKsaJEaiiZZme9u7Tq X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncueEsfQog3rsBsJFJGg5b8avmMkFS6c19sFLu4uPbuUDcHVvfqQ/BDM/ZOYqjm Mt3LgDGZkaoRzhr4lZvGdyzCaRU714qieG8bfvs+Sio6lnIwfo4zfGZOt8oIm01+KmPmBgySp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGfyngWKGycACQ7YYsk1nFBavq4WIbcmvy6ErCUG5/S9nkLByR4QuiRsNtJaagHzL7KDXeYH9TUn6M2B9CyUgE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:548e:b0:431:5e3c:2ff0 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-436686431a0mr273964485e9.8.1735541528421; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 22:52:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20241227194602.25785-1-ashvith@noreply.codeberg.org> <87o70topa7.fsf@envs.net> In-Reply-To: <87o70topa7.fsf@envs.net> From: Ashvith Shetty Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 06:51:57 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004b6e5e062a7740a5" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.66 X-Spam-Score: -4.66 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: ACA481C666 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: N2OWSg+rBmym --0000000000004b6e5e062a7740a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 2:49=E2=80=AFAM =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 wrote: > Hello, could you explain more about those inconsistency and missing > files? For example, Thunar's `make check` did not run tests for the archive, as opposed to git as the source. Only after switching to git was I able to catch how one of the abicheck tests were broken. Now, this has been resolved in a future version, but given how it would be highly unlikely to catch these issues via archive as the source, I thought that it was better if we made use of git instead. > Build from git is more expensive than tarballs, as it download > more and need more dependencies. Another issue with archive as the source is that the archive includes files that have been generated on another system via the git repository. For git, since we are building directly from the repo itself, I believe that it would be a right pick. Or maybe we can switch to downloading the tag-specific archive from git itself? > This package is still useful for GTK2 applications, we could update its > description and move it into 'gtk.scm' to avoid some confusions. >From the data on Repology, it looks like this package has been removed from most of the other distributions out there. I've also come across other gtk2 engines that could be used in its place, like murrine, pixbuf and aurora. What do you think? Regards, Ashvith --0000000000004b6e5e062a7740a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 2:49=E2=80=AFAM= =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 <iyzson= g@envs.net> wrote:

> Hello, could you explain more about t= hose inconsistency and missing
> files?

For example, Thunar's `make check` did not run tests for the archive, as=C2=A0<= /div>
opposed to git as the source. Only after switching to git was I a= ble to=C2=A0
catch how one of=C2=A0 the abicheck tests were broke= n. Now, this has been=C2=A0
resolved in a future version, but giv= en how it would be highly unlikely to=C2=A0
catch these issues vi= a archive as the source, I thought that it was better if=C2=A0
we= made use of git instead.

> Build from git = is more expensive than tarballs, as it download
> more and nee= d more dependencies.

Another issue with archive as= the source is that the archive includes files that=C2=A0
have be= en generated on another system via the git repository. For git, since=C2=A0=
we are building directly from the repo itself, I believe that it= would be a right
pick. Or maybe we can switch to downloadin= g the tag-specific archive from=C2=A0
git itself?
<= br>
> This package is still useful for GTK2 applications, we could = update its
> description and move it into 'gtk.scm' to a= void some confusions.

From the data on Repology, i= t looks like this package has been removed=C2=A0
from most of the= other distributions out there. I've also come across other
<= div>gtk2 engines that could be used in its place, like murrine, pixbuf and = aurora.

What do you think?

Regards,
Ashvith
--0000000000004b6e5e062a7740a5--