Well, less than guix refresh -l ocaml@4.07 :) Le 13 octobre 2020 07:41:37 GMT-04:00, zimoun a écrit : > >Well, the duplicate reported before appears: > >--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >[100%] GUILEC gnu/packages/ocaml.go >gnu/packages/ocaml.scm:2489:0: warning: shadows previous definition of >`ocaml-stdlib-shims' at gnu/packages/ocaml.scm:268:0 >--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > >On Thu, 01 Oct 2020 at 15:41, Julien Lepiller >wrote: > >> * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml4.07-gen, ocaml4.07-sedlex) >> (ocaml4.07-ezjsonm, ocaml4.07-uri, ocaml4.07-charinfo-width) >> (ocaml4.07-zed, ocaml4.07-lambda-term, ocaml4.07-utop) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-inline-test, ocaml4.07-earley, ocaml4.07-merlin) >> (ocaml4.07-sexplib0, ocaml4.07-parsexp, ocaml4.07-sexplib) >> (ocaml4.07-base, ocaml4.07-stdio, ocaml4.07-ppxlib, >ocaml4.07-ppx-compare) >> (ocaml4.07-fieldslib, ocaml4.07-variantslib, >ocaml4.07-ppx-fields-conv) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-sexp-conv, ocaml4.07-ppx-variants-conv) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-custom-printf, ocaml4.07-bin-prot, ocaml4.07-ppx-hash) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-enumerate, ocaml4.07-ppx-bench, ocaml4.07-ppx-here) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-typerep, ocaml4.07-ppx-sexp-value, > >The package ’ocaml4.07-ppx-typerep’ does not exist. Maybe >’ocaml4.07-typerep’ or ’ocaml4.07-ppx-typerep-conv‘? I have been to >lazy to find the correct one. Sorry. > > >> ocaml4.07-ppx-sexp-message) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-pipebang, ocaml4.07-ppx-optional, >ocaml4.07-ppx-optcomp) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-let, ocaml4.07-ppx-fail, ocaml4.07-ppx-assert) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-expect, ocaml4.07-ppx-js-style, >ocaml4.07-ppx-typerep-conv) >> (ocaml4.07-ppx-base, ocaml4.07-ppx-bin-prot, ocaml4.07-ppx-jane) >> (ocaml4.07-splittable-random, ocaml4.07-configurator, >ocaml4.07-spawn) >> (ocaml4.07-core, ocaml4.07-core-kernel)[arguments]: Use >ocaml4.07-dune. >> --- >> gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 147 >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > >I am not sure to understand how to use “guix refresh” to check how many >packages are impacted. > > >Otherwise, LGTM.