[bug#67114] [PATCH 01/14] gnu: Add emacs-dnt.

[Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>]

Am Sonntag, dem 12.11.2023 um 10:09 -0800 schrieb Ian Eure:
> 
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Am Samstag, dem 11.11.2023 um 14:38 -0800 schrieb Ian Eure:
> > > * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-dnt): New variable.
> > > ---
> > >  gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm 
> > > b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> > > index 1319c353cb..4648432441 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> > > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@
> > >  ;;; Copyright © 2023 Sergiu Ivanov <sivanov@colimite.fr>
> > >  ;;; Copyright © 2023 Camilo Q.S. (Distopico) 
> > > <distopico@riseup.net>
> > >  ;;; Copyright © 2023 Thanos Apollo <public@thanosapollo.com>
> > > +;;; Copyright © 2023 Ian Eure <ian@retrospec.tv>
> > >  ;;;
> > >  ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
> > >  ;;;
> > > @@ -3294,6 +3295,30 @@ (define-public emacs-eww-lnum
> > >  incrementally confined in Isearch manner.")
> > >      (license license:gpl3+)))
> > >  
> > > +(define-public emacs-dnt
> > > +  (let ((commit "d28d232d682094ab79cfa78c97668c6ebd327c8c")
> > > +        (version "0.0.1")
> > > +        (revision "1"))
> > > +    (package
> > > +      (name "emacs-dnt")
> > > +      (version (git-version version revision commit))
> > It's better to inline the base version.
> 
> Why?  As a new contributor, I’m genuinely curious.
> 
> I let-bound it because:
> 
> - In the info manual for Guix, two out of three were already.
> - You’ll need to update the commit and version at the same time in 
>   many cases, so having them next to each other seems convenient.
> - The variable names make it more obvious if arguments to 
>   git-version get swapped around.
You are introducing a gratuitous line, plus making room for confusion
between the let-bound version and the syntax-introduced one.  The
benefit of having "one less place" more often than not doesn't even
save you a hunk, whereas in the preferred case for Guix where we'd use
actual versions, you'd have to reindent the whole package anyways.

Cheer