From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebCbv-00006j-Df for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:48:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebCbq-0001kv-Mz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:48:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebCbq-0001kR-JG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebCbq-00039N-5s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:48:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#28973] [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add strongswan. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87r2tsbcer.fsf@vany.ca> <555ac710-dd1f-4c74-036a-ad14683e1e5e@tobias.gr> <87a80gb0us.fsf@vany.ca> <87k1ylzy6y.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu7cm5h8.fsf@gnu.org> <87wp0nf17i.fsf@vany.ca> <2cee2d58-f645-487f-eda6-9714eaad5e9f@tobias.gr> <87mv1eeu6i.fsf@vany.ca> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Message-ID: <9b85d987-e691-a89e-f4ee-1ce663b5c928@tobias.gr> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:50:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mv1eeu6i.fsf@vany.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: adam@vany.ca, 28973@debbugs.gnu.org Adam Van Ymeren wrote on 15/01/18 at 21:36: > There is one file who's license I am not sure what to name. > > src/libstrongswan/plugins/pkcs11.h > > The text of the license is: > > "This file is free software; as a special exception the author gives > unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it, with or without > modifications, as long as this notice is preserved." > > Debian listed this as "MIT" but I don't believe that is correct. I > can't find text of any "MIT" license like this, and it doesn't match the > expat license either. There's always the non-copyleft procedure for uncommon (but free) licences that don't have their own entry. Is that the entire licence text? It sounds strange to me (exception to what?). I'm obviously not clever enough to be a lawyer. Yay, T G-R