Hi, Some comments on the patch. On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 15:11 +0200, david larsson wrote: > [...] > +(define-public prips > + (package > + (name "prips") > + (version "1.1.1") > + (source > + (origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri (string-append "https://devel.ringlet.net/files/sys/" > + name "/" name "-" version ".tar.xz")) > + (sha256 > + (base32 > "1a33vbl4w603mk6mm5r3vhk87fy3dfk5wdpch0yd3ncbkg3fmvqn")))) > + (build-system gnu-build-system) > + (arguments > + '(#:make-flags (list "CC=gcc") As "CC=gcc" is a constant, I would write '("CC=gcc") here, though admittedly this is largely a matter of taste. Another problem: when cross-compiling, "gcc" will be a compiler for the build system, not the host system (assuming I got the terminology right). Instead, write `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC" ,(cc-for-target))) ...) (The quasiquote ` is important.) (TODO to self: fix other packages that incorrectly set "CC=gcc" ...) > + #:phases (modify-phases > + %standard-phases %standard-phases shouldn't be on a separate line here. > + (delete 'configure) > + (delete 'check) Prips has some tests, so don't delete this phase. > + (replace 'install > + (lambda _ > + (let* > + ((bin-dir (string-append %output "/bin")) > + (bin-file (string-append bin-dir "/prips"))) The ((bin-dir ...)) should be on the same line as 'let*'. > + (mkdir-p bin-dir) > + (copy-file "prips" bin-file) > + (chmod bin-file #o700))))))) Why are you making bin/prips writable? Shouldn't this be (chmod bin-file #o600) instead? > + (synopsis "Tool that prints the IP addresses in a given range") > + (description "Prips can be used to print all of the IP addresses in > + a given range. This allows the enhancement of tools only work ‘Enhancement’ is rather vague and leaning towards marketing-speak. I do not have an alternative suggestion however. > + on one host at a time (e.g. whois).") > + (home-page "https://devel.ringlet.net/sysutils/prips/") > + (license license:gpl2))) I looked at the source code and it seems prips is actually gpl2+. Greetings, Maxime.