From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51550)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hksPV-0002bf-G2
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:52:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hksPU-0000cR-0d
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:52:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53270)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hksPS-0000bg-Jt
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:52:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hksPS-000553-HZ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:52:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#36562] downgrading  ghc-ansi-terminal
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36562.B.156268750819507@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51464)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <rob@vllmrt.net>) id 1hksP7-0002Vc-FJ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:51:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rob@vllmrt.net>) id 1hksP6-0000QJ-GQ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:51:41 -0400
Received: from mx2a.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:104:0:2:25:2]:17142
 helo=mx2.mailbox.org)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rob@vllmrt.net>) id 1hksP6-0000Oz-1Z
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:51:40 -0400
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org
 [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:1:0])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9B8BA015C
 for <guix-patches@gnu.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2019 17:51:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240])
 by spamfilter06.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter06.heinlein-hosting.de
 [80.241.56.125]) (amavisd-new, port 10030)
 with ESMTP id eeyrWqVtRX5j for <guix-patches@gnu.org>;
 Tue,  9 Jul 2019 17:51:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Robert Vollmert <rob@vllmrt.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Message-Id: <92ADF111-C58E-45B6-B20A-A98EE61838FA@vllmrt.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:51:33 +0200
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 36562@debbugs.gnu.org

A patch set to downgrade ghc-ansi-terminal to the stackage LTS
version, to have a consistent package set. This also downgrades
the recently added ghc-validation to version 1 from version 1.1.

The problem with the current situation is that we have some
packages depending on the updated ghc-ansi-terminal 0.9, and
some depending on ghc-ansi-terminal 0.8. By themselves, they
compile, but it=E2=80=99s now impossible to package modules that depend
directly on packages from both sets.

@Jacob: Would ghc-validation version 1 be sufficient for you
purposes?

Cheers
Robert