From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzNc-0002lJ-6l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:44:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzNa-00017G-BR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:44:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzNa-00017A-8f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzNa-0000X2-7D for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:44:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40597] [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions. Resent-Message-ID: References: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com> <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org> From: Vincent Legoll Message-ID: <91ebc21a-2d35-a51d-c474-799d12db2cca@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:43:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 40597@debbugs.gnu.org On 13/04/2020 15:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Vincent Legoll skribis: > >> * doc/guix.texi (Binary Installation): Mention 'make update-guix-package'. > I agree this needs to be documented, but I don’t think this is the right > place: “Binary Installation” is for users who want to install. Instead, > we should document it in a section explicitly targeting Guix developers, > maybe under “Contributing”? OK, I'll see what I can do. -- Vincent Legoll