From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGsT-0006Nq-Lj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:11:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGsR-0004XU-7n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:11:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGsP-0004Wj-TB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:11:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGsP-0004h0-L3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:11:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#36411] [PATCH] gnu: Add libresprite. Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGrY-000638-Sl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:10:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGrX-0003nx-Rn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:10:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:59738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGrX-0003mu-HA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:10:07 -0400 Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818E51A2FEF for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 990DC1203AC for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:10:04 -0700 (PDT) References: <87y31m7d62.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <30d2762e-8cea-fa2d-24df-68a019fcea90@riseup.net> <8736jthkkd.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87woh4bee5.fsf@nckx> From: swedebugia Message-ID: <909e98f0-d945-3e23-0600-0ce09930e960@riseup.net> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:10:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87woh4bee5.fsf@nckx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 36411@debbugs.gnu.org On 2019-06-29 17:27, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Jakob, >=20 > I didn't check all the bundled packages, but at least freetype2 and=20 > libpng are trivial to unbundle (not patched in any way) and probably th= e=20 > most important to, security-wise, so things are looking good even if=20 > upstream wouldn't cooperate. >=20 > Jakob L. Kreuze wrote: >>> Synopsis? >> >> Inherited from 'aseprite'.=C2=A0 Should I alter it to mention that >> it's a fork of Aseprite? >=20 > It's certainly not important enough to include in the synopsis, so=20 > inheriting that is fine. >=20 > Now, I'd say it needn't be added to the description either.=C2=A0 We=20 > generally don't note the often chequered ancestry of our packages, nor=20 > the fact that they are =E2=80=98free=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98open source=E2= =80=99, and this is just a=20 > combination of the two.=C2=A0 But at least description space is cheaper= if=20 > you disagree.=C2=A0 ;-) What about noting it in the top of the recipe as a comment? ";; This is a fork of xx" I find that helpful but it might be unnecessary too? --=20 Cheers Swedebugia