From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVg6-0001lj-8Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:32:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVg3-0000Xa-5J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:32:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVg3-0000XM-0y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:32:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVg2-0000SP-Id for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:32:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26420: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-use-package. Resent-Message-ID: Message-Id: <8b5ebed7.AEQAJFaVgOgAAAAAAAAAAAOzcd8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY61Dr@mailjet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Arun Isaac Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:01:14 +0530 In-reply-to: <878tn8hbl4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170409165703.9034-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <8c88a4c1.ADsAAHIoMD8AAAAAAAAAAAOzcd8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY6mf5@mailjet.com> <878tn8hbl4.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 26420@debbugs.gnu.org >> + (arguments >> + `(#:phases >> + (modify-phases %standard-phases >> + ;; tests fail in this release >> + (add-before 'install 'check >> + (lambda _ >> + (zero? (system* "emacs" "--batch" "-L" "." >> + "-l" "use-package-tests.el" >> + "-f" "ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit")) >> + #t))))) > > Please remove #t as it would hide a failure of the “emacs --batch” > command above. As noted in the comment, the tests fail in this release. I have put the #t there to make the package build succeed. In the upstream git checkout, tests pass. So, in the next release, tests should pass. When updating the package, the #t should be removed. Is this ok? Shall I leave the #t there? > @file{.emacs} in the synopsis and description. Will do.