From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iol4p-0004cs-FI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:23:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iol4o-0007hS-5V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:23:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iol4n-0007hK-UI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iol4n-0004iu-Ra for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:23:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#38994] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glib: Fix g_app_info_get_default_for_type. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20200106193751.725-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20200107004510.176c34d8@scratchpost.org> From: Jonathan Brielmaier Message-ID: <8a1cd5ae-003b-e912-69ae-a3504c5fc039@web.de> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:22:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200107004510.176c34d8@scratchpost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 38994@debbugs.gnu.org On 07.01.20 00:45, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >> I would personally like, if we can update to 2.62. Because that is >> needed for updating gnome to 3.34 >> (https://gitlab.com/jonsger/Guix/commits/wip-gnome-3.34). What do you t= hink? > > Sure, why not (on core-updates)? There's glib 2.63 released upstream. I wonder if uneven release numbers at glib mark development/unstable releases. As it's the case in the rest of GNOME. > Right now, core-updates has glib 2.60.6 still (as has master). > > If you try to update glib, be advised that core-updates is broken right = now[1]. > > On the other hand that means that we could update glib on core-updates r= ight > away since core-updates could not built anything using it anyway :P > > (The bug upstream is still open, so it will not improve things in that r= egard) > > [1] texlive-bin build error ; texlive is req= uired for glib-with-documentation.