[bug#48314] Patches to install guix system on Raspberry Pi

[Stefan <stefan-guix@vodafonemail.de>]

Hi!

> @Stefan: On the other hand, I'm not sure of the general utility of make-defconfig.

There is currently no simple way change the Linux configuration. Also by modifying the final .config as of today (which kind of contains all CONFIG_…-variables), as far as I know dependencies will not be resolved and conflicting configurations can easily happen.

A defconfig however gets striped down to a minimum of required CONFIG_…-variables and all “missing” ones get either default values or get determined through dependecies. So adding /removing/changing some few configurations to a defconfig is less error-prone. Further defconfig files are easier to maintain in git. There is a reason that only defconfig files are maintained in the Linux sources.

Please note that the patch allows to select a defconfig file from the Linux sources (if the parameter is a string), and also to provide an own defconfig file (if it is a file-like object).

> Sounds like a too weird special case to have general utility.

Well, there is the need already in Guix to have e.g. the predefined linux-libre-arm64-generic kernel, wich just uses a certain defconfig file from the Linux sources. But this possibility is not exported.

There are many defconfig files for all sorts of boards, especially for arm32. Why shouldn’t we allow to use any of these? Why should users be restrict to “selected” configurations? Why should Guix’ kernel configuration be preferred over the plain x86_64_defconfig?

And take a look at the last patch: In order to make that kernel boot on a Raspberry from an NFS root, some few configurations are missing, which can easily be added with the “modify-linux” function. By the way, maybe “customize-linux” would be a better name.

And there is another patch from me to make the NFS root test pass. As the Linux kernel build by Guix is not able to boot over NFS root in qemu, I used the same function there to add the missing configurations.

Oh, and finally, I need the same underlying kconfig.scm and a similar defconfig modification for U-Boot as well, which allowed me to simplify the existing U-Boot packages.


Bye

Stefan