From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuib-0004I6-GN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:52:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuiY-0002Ye-Ej for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:52:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuiY-0002YU-BC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuiY-0006c2-1l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:52:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26374: [PATCH] gnu: Move dillo to web.scm. Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <20170405191411.32328-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <87lgreabjk.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:50:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lgreabjk.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (Marius Bakke's message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2017 21:39:59 +0200") Message-ID: <87zifu2z34.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 26374@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> * gnu/packages/dillo.scm: Remove file and move dillo... >> * gnu/packages/web.scm: ...here. >> * gnu/local.mk: Remove reference to removed file. > > I think it would be good to have a "web-browsers.scm" to try and keep > things organized; web.scm is already a kind of "kitchen sink" for > anything web related. What do others think? > > There are a few other modules that could be moved into a > web-browsers.scm as well. Splitting web.scm into more specific parts could be useful IMO. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAljlgt8ACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg3wjBAAvZMJkbk/xiVqIJjyxL0VNAD9gFVL51f4XvRLr6k6Zz4vxjWwuvKmc6XK XAqwBQ1+5uxdb5fmSExUJluyAwm68bBbzLpdTbcHhi5+7ertKKhpFy9erKc6gYfG 2HtsvR38gZU5rBZ2PJVsnZFE3+EhUZUGZYgknjXkDQl1TlfFKJVfO1/9AJoAMw+T GCCGgihroEcyXuSWiK35DfkVMUT+TNtvj58TY1hH9cnXyzXM/lXXXhpB9sy+fxux AzeLFjDxWX1qz+uO1o7XmlU8uVNm4AwW+cJiYY8raqDM22F/e7R+7kuB/HnIxQml NKTG50pbjdGpYhK9Dhe1yyAiCOi7cwQ7KaNxT4xMDyyDeK8MU3v++TyTYyxm2Xk0 ikXLZEhovdadnJVqMuZZFlLQYRwh88MAYbg7D8y5v+VkslONaZld1sYBeAhUUi2+ PNO7ByiahS5sxtjdRvxt/CiMdfhCtkzZftaBhnN4qaI5A33BNOdgVuc+rTwnRXBy KmOqSOsFH+fKEF6aFHJg0tQQyIr4iXbD0myp026STppXqUmhiagbEk7ku4LJ2xFM z81ZmW90HixFaoIwshinQZjgdSmyYzryNK7d+PUBrx5pwnItoatA71qX3r70yzJi 3AU2G2ivTTbfm1tGtaE2Fa9LmO5WLAOUp5vKaDuuuM1rRgZzOcM= =rrlX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--